Big4 RSS FEEDhttp://www.big4.com/2010-07-30 09:22:522010-07-30 09:22:52
There"s been so much press on the recently released report on the spectacular failure of Lehman Brothers by Anton Valukas, so we"ll just focus on the key elements which involve Lehman"s auditor Ernst & Young.

Valukas is highly critical of E&Y"s work, claiming that they did not perform the due diligence needed by audit firms, the ultimate watchdog of investors" interests. He believes there is a case of negligence and professional malpractice against the firm. Though in a very limited sense Lehman perhaps followed standard accounting principles, and this is the basis on which E&Y signed off on their annual and quarterly filings, they wrongly categorized a repo as a sale to knowingly report a lower leverage ratio, they exceeded internal limits on the infamous Repo 105, and they found a loophole in the British system to execute these transactions, and keep them off the public eye.

Lehman was clearly at fault and grossly fraudulent in hiding this from investors, and then obfuscating answers to clear questions from analysts. Is Ernst and Young equally culpable?

E&Y should have been more rigorous in pursuing this issue, knowing that it was material, being misrepresented and highly abused. With full knowledge of its usage, and then signing off on SEC documents is definitely negligent.

E&Y is now being investigated by the FRC in the UK and very likely in due course by the SEC. The Saudi government has already cancelled E&Y"s security license in the kingdom. The law suits are yet to hit the wires, but they are coming. The key is whether a criminal indictment of the firm is likely, recall that this is what brought down Andersen. Dealing with civil suits is only a matter of money, but a criminal charge is going to send clients away in droves. The critical question is whether the industry can withstand the loss of a $20 billion accounting giant, the consequences of a Big Three are quite hard to imagine.

E&Y was recently hit with a $8.5 million fine by the SEC for its involvement with Bally Fitness, and in that settlement E&Y agreed to tighten internal procedures and refrain from audit abuse. So the SEC is unlikely to look favorably on this.

The next few days will reveal how the regulators, erstwhile shareholders of Lehman and other stakeholders will move against E&Y. Valukas" statement that there is sufficient evidence to show that E&Y was negligent is enough to spur a whole host of law suits.

E&Y is in a very tough spot now, and while it may escape an imploding collapse like Andersen, the long tail of Lehman is sure to create a strong whiplash with painful monetary, reputational and punitive consequences.

]]>03.17.201010:15 pm
If you"re from the UK or have plans to visit the British Isles, you may want to keep one eye on the foreign exchange market and one eye on the costs of visiting London. It's an expensive city in many ways, and the hotels have been less than busy, but that's slowly changing as PwC is finding with London hoteliers.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is revealing that RevPAR (revenue per available room) for London hotel rooms, which declined almost 10% from 2008 to 2009, will grow 3% from 2009 to 2010, and then further by another 5% in 2011. The 3% increase in 2010 is comprised of a 1.8% average room rate increase and a 1.3% occupancy growth. For next year, prices are up 2.9% and occupancy steps up 1.7%.

Robert Milburn, UK Hospitality & Leisure leader, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, said, " We think the worst is over and London looks set to build on its flourish in late 2009." London has seen five consecutive months of occupancy growth from September 2009 to January 2010; and Q4-2009 occupancy reaching 82.5% - a record Q4 high.

So it appears that the business visitor and the tourist are all coming back to London in recent months, perhaps indicating an end to a turbulent period for UK hotels. Not that London"s cheap by any standards, visitors will perhaps numerically equate London prices to New York prices, except that the British pound is still 1.60 US Dollars and 1.15 Euros. The average rate for 2010 is expected to be nearly £120 per night.

London is a notable destination for the business traveler, but has only so many rooms, so even a small increase in inbound travel can push up prices. Consider also that London will be hosting the 2012 Summer Olympic Games, which should bring on more supply of rooms, but that happens only in 2011. Regardless of this increase on the supply side, PwC still expects rates to move up to an average of £124 next year. Pushing down demand is an expected cutback in departmental public sector spending, which could bring down revenue increases by a full 1%

So, while there is some good news, all troubles are not yet done, hoteliers remain optimistic about latent demand but are quite aware of the overwhelming constraints to return to the go-go pre-crisis years.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, London Hotels, RevPAR, Olympics, supply, rooms FX
]]>03.02.20101:50 pm
The "Fax Effect", if you can recall, illustrates the exponential power and cost saving inherent in large networks.

And it goes something like this. If you had a fax machine, and no one else had one, then it would be quite valueless, as you can neither send nor receive faxes. Now, if your friend bought a fax machine, you can exchange faxes with him. Immediately you have both gained value. But fax machines would still be relatively expensive for both of you.

If a third friend also got a machine, faxes can go through in three paths, creating even higher value for three people. If a fourth friend also got one, value is created not only for the fourth friend, but also for all the three other friends as this opens up multiple pathways between four nodes.

And so on, as more people bought fax machines and joined the expanding network, the power of the network multiplies exponentially for all participants and the cost of the communication and hardware goes down dramatically. The tipping point occurs when everyone joins the network since the cost to join is so low.

You get the point on faxes. Though no one would even consider sending a fax today, the network effect is still a valuable takeaway. The internet basically made the fax redundant.

We see that Accenture has recently joined the AT&T Business Exchange, which allows multiple companies in different locations to connect to one another using Cisco Telepresence, a sophisticated video conferencing technology. Now Accenture can collaborate with clients, suppliers and others outside the company from its 50 equipped rooms worldwide. And Frank Modruson, Chief Information Officer, Accenture says, "Now that we"re open for business on the AT&T Business Exchange, we expect usage to grow exponentially as employees seize the opportunity to communicate with clients, suppliers, partners, and other external constituencies."

In 2 years, Accenture has already realized significant payback, saving millions in travel-related expenses, eliminating hours of tiring travel for its employees, and reducing carbon emissions, and these will only grow as the AT&T Business Exchange extends the program to outside constituents, which already includes more than 50 companies which are connecting with one another via hundreds of AT&T Telepresence Solution sites worldwide on over 1,000 other Cisco TelePresence meeting endpoints deployed worldwide for either intra-company or inter-company meetings.

We can see the parallel here quite well with the fax phenomenon. As companies begin to add themselves to a global network like AT&T, the value of the teleconferencing network grows for all participants and the cost falls quickly. As this spreads, soon all companies and their managemenent will be teleconferencing with each other. Which then means that no one will need to travel to meet in person with anyone else, except when unavoidable.

And like the fax was obsoleted by the internt, this could be a big blow to airline and rail travel, which could be rendered equally non-essential by teleconferencing.

.....we'll telepresence next Monday 2 pm - OK?


Accenture, ATT Business Exchange, teleconferencing, Cisco, telepresence, fax, travel, meetings]]>03.02.201012:20 pm
Here"s an interesting note from KPMG"s global web site. Rodger Hill, Head of Financial Management Advisory at KPMG UK, believes that "The days of purely measuring business performance by financial result may well be numbered. In its place, I believe that discerning investors will look for something broader to measure an entity"s real contribution and performance."

And this broader measurement will be the "triple bottom line", to include metrics for People, Planet and Profits.

Hill thinks that the current credit crisis will accelerate and catalyze the movement towards a larger set of financial and non-financial measures, which investors have been wanting for a long time to fully understand corporate value. He argues that if these had been fully reported, we could have assuaged the huge impact of this economic slowdown, as investors would have focused more acutely on distress signals from debt metrics.

But he raises some critical questions from the organizational perspective

Does the finance function have capabilities to deliver the right information at the right time to information hungry stakeholders?
Could companies identify the social and environmental information which stakeholders will require?
Will companies be able to adequately communicate such information to all relevant parties?

Hill contends that the triple bottom line debate is one which you"re going to hear more and more about in the coming months and years.

This triple bottom line is very reminiscent of the Balanced Scorecard approach from Kaplan and Norton, where both financial and non-financial measures are suppposed to be appropriately calibrated, measured and reported both to internal and external stakeholders. This had consultants buzzing for a while in the nineties, pushing thought leadership and instituting such systems within clients. However, it did not catch on as much as all expected, as the cost of the framework did not quite justify its potential rewards. Companies found standardization and internal reporting sytems quite difficult challenges to overcome.

Clearly investors and internal stakeholders love more data and metrics they can measure across different companies in the same industry, as well as across industries. But public companies have legacy systems and processses designed to report necessary financial metrics, so any changes require much customization and education, a cost that many companies are not totally willing to invest without tangible returns.

This new triple bottom line of financial, employee and corporate social responsibility reporting has similar lofty goals but will likely face similar implementation challenges. Unless there are clear reporting mandates from legal and regulatory agencies which lay out standardized frameworks for collating and displaying this data, companies are arguably not that excited about spending money on this topic.

The current crisis has, as Hill points out, really shaken the system, and there would be surely subsequent events which may force companies to report on a comprehensive basis. The SEC's recent guidance on climate change reporting and the global shift to a single IFRS standards are good examples.

So while we, in theory, are in full agreement with KPMG's notion of the triple bottom line and the ensuing debate, the glass appears only half-full, and needs a regulatory mandate before the liquid reaches the rim.

KPMG, Triple Bottom Line, Balanced Scorecard, reporting, CSR, financial measures, regulation]]>03.02.201011:42 am At 20,000+ members, one of the largest networking groups for Big 4 Firm alumni and professionals

New York (PRWEB) February 23, 2010 -- Big4.com, the premier social networking forum for alumni and professionals of Accenture, Andersen, BearingPoint, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers announced today that its LinkedIn.com sponsored group, the "Big Four Firms Alumni & Professionals Global Network", (http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1022) has exceeded a landmark level of 20,000 group members. This group is now ranked fifth of over 90,000 alumni groups, and in the top 150 (top 0.3%) of over 500,000 LinkedIn group of all categories.

"LinkedIn is the leading global social network for professionals, and our group provides a well-recognized platform within LinkedIn for alumni and professionals from all the Big Four firms. The group helps members extend their networks, reconnect with old colleagues, apply to challenging job opportunities and engage in valuable discussions. The group is truly global with members from North and South America, Europe, Africa and Asia." stated David Hunter, Vice President at Big4.com.

The Big Four group is a well-recognized platform within LinkedIn for Big 4 firm alumni and professionals to expand their network.
He further said, "We are pleased to see the group growing at more 1,300 members each month. We welcome Big Four alumni and current professionals to join, including those who have worked at Arthur Andersen, Andersen, Andersen Consulting, Arthur Young, Ernst & Whinney, Price Waterhouse, Coopers and Lybrand, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, Touche Ross, Peat Marwick Mitchell, Klynveld Main Goerdeler, as also BearingPoint, Resources Global Professionals, Protiviti, Big Four spin-off firms and firms affiliated with the Big Four from all countries. We are also enabling group membership to recruiters and search firms who benefit our members by providing job opportunities specific to their background. The job board on this group very active with dozens of new opportunities posted daily, and the group hosts lively discussions and relevant news. The group is unique by including professionals with a common culture from all the Big Four firms."

The group is at Big Four Firms Alumni & Professionals Global Network (Big4.com) http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1022. Prior membership at LinkedIn is needed. Both memberships are free.

About Big4.com

Big4.com is the tax and accounting profession"s premier resource for Big 4 professionals and alumni. Our goal is to build upon the commonly shared experiences of alumni and professionals who have worked or are at any of the Big four firms and provide a trusted online platform for inter-alumni connectivity, enabling users to post and apply to attractive opportunities, get updates on Big 4 news, and happenings through our official site blog. Big4.com has a strong presence on key social media platforms:

Twitter: www.Twitter/big4alum (2,700+ followers) was recently ranked one of only five "The Top Five Twitter Feeds for Job Hunters in Accounting" by FINS/Wall Street Journal
LinkedIn: The Big Four Alumni and Professionals group is one of the largest alumni groups with 20,000+ members. http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=1022
Facebook: The Big4 fan page has 900+ fans at www.facebook.com/big4page
Xing: The Big Four Alumni and Professionals group has 800+ members at https://www.xing.com/net/big4alumni


For more information on Big4.com, please visit the site, or call 866.690.5050.

###

]]>02.25.20102:26 pm
The SEC just released a statement on IFRS which shows its supportive position and reaffirms its belief in that a single set of high-quality globally accepted accounting standards would benefit U.S investors, thus actively encouraging the convergence of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Also, the SEC directed a committee led by Chief Accountant, James Kroeker (ex KPMG partner) to prepare a Work Plan, to figure out all the implications of the use of IFRS by U.S. companies, taking into account current state and eventual completion of various "convergence projects" between U.S. and international accounting standards-setters.

This report is expected by October 2010, and by next year 2011, the SEC will decide whether to incorporate IFRS into the U.S. financial reporting system, and if so, when and how.

As background, in November 2008, the SEC proposed a Roadmap, and received more than 200 comment letters from a wide variety of market participants, including investors, regulators, issuers, accountants, attorneys, academia, standards setters, and international organizations. All commenters were supportive of the goal of having a single set of high-quality globally accepted accounting standards (GAAS), but had varying opinions on how to achieve this end. In that Proposed Roadmap, the SEC had said that 2011 would be the time frame to make any decision on implementation, and in general it appears to be keeping to that timing.

The charter for this Work Plan is then to carefully consider and deliberate whether such a change is in the best interest of U.S. investors and markets. The Work Plan will focus on six key issues:

1. Comprehensiveness: Determining whether IFRS is sufficiently developed and consistent in application for use as the single set of accounting standards in the U.S. reporting system.

2. Independence of Standard Setting: Ensuring that accounting standards are set by an independent standard-setter and for the benefit of investors.

3. Investor Education: Investor understanding and education regarding IFRS, and how it differs from U.S. GAAP.

4. Impact on US Environment: Understanding whether U.S. laws or regulations, outside of the securities laws, for example tax laws and regulatory reporting, would be affected by a change in accounting standards.

5. Impact on Issuers: Understanding the impact on companies, both large and small, including changes to accounting systems, changes to contractual arrangements, corporate governance considerations and litigation contingencies.

6. Human Capital Readiness: Determining whether the people who prepare and audit financial statements are sufficiently prepared, through education and experience, to make the conversion to IFRS.

Timing

So, after the Work Plan is developed later in 2010, the SEC will make a determination in 2011, and then it feels that US issuers will need 4 to 5 years to implement this, so the first date that the US can migrate from GAAP to IFRS is 2015 or 2016, and certainly not before 2015.

Impact of Change to IFRS

For several decades now, US companies, regulators, auditors, investors and other stakeholders have fully imbibed the implications of GAAP, and built other infrastructures which rely on these standards. It is fully integrated in almost every facet of the US financial, accounting and capital market system. Also with the tremendous liquidity of the US capital markets, both local and foreign investors understand GAAP financials, and make trillions of dollars of key decisions based on that understanding.

It has been the de-facto standard for a long time, so migration to another set of rules and standards (though a very relevant goal, which no one disputes) has large implications on a whole set of organizations, companies, firms, investors, policies, some of it quite obvious, while some impacts are quite complicated and may not be so visible at first glance.

Consider the questions that are raised in perusing through the initial charter of the Work Plan Committee, which shows that even after a decision is made to adopt IFRS, the pathway to implementation has to be thoughtfully considered for all stakeholders:

Are the IFRS standards of sufficiently high quality to support the Commission"s mission of protecting investors and facilitating capital formation?
Can IFRS be supported by an infrastructure that ensures that the standards are established by independent standard setters, and are rigorously and consistently interpreted and applied?
How will investors understand and compare US companies who have already begun to report early using IFRS standards?
Is the IFRS sufficiently developed or applied in practice to be adopted as a single
set of global standards, since it is somewhat less detailed and offers prescriptive guidance?
Is there sufficient auditability and enforceability of IFRS, including the risk of opportunistic accounting etc.?
Is the IASB a strong enough body to be an independent standard setter that is accountable, independent, and free from undue influence
What impact will changes have, say on regulators and the IRS, who have built systems that rely on U.S. GAAP as a basis for their reporting regimes.
What additional costs, effort, and time must companies incur on accounting systems, controls, and procedures due to this transition?
What will be the role of FASB should IFRS be incorporated into the U.S. financial reporting system for U.S. issuers.
Since IFRS currently differs from U.S. GAAP in a number of areas, will there be significant investor education required on IFRS?
What is the impact on PCAOB, through convergence of PCAOB standards with IASB?

What We Think

So, publicly and openly the SEC did validate in this statement their unequivocal support for a global accounting standard, and it appears that all the comments did also align with the need to achieve this singular goal. However, the question of when still remains to be fully and completely addressed, the SEC is giving itself time till next year, and then if the work plan and the convergence projects provide sufficient evidence and clarity, it will propose an effective date for transition "four or five years" in the future.

The accounting industry ought to be fairly pleased with this open support, but investors, companies and firms continue to be in the dark on the exact date of this transition. Only the passage of time over the course of this year and the next (with public pronouncements from the Work Plan committee) will the timing question get better clarification. Till then, US companies and audit firms will need to operate with uncertainty, keeping one foot in
GAAP, while tentatively putting the other foot on the IFRS camp.

Impact on Auditors

In closing, we ask: what is the impact on auditors? We reproduce below an extract from the 71 page Work Plan which deals specifically with this issue, and you can see that it can have implications on how auditors are trained, what new tools and approaches they will need to conduct their audit, how IFRS impacts the larger versus smaller firms, and whether firms can maintain quality in face of high demand. Note that all the Big Four firms have already begun anticipating this move and are proactively aligning their accountants, systems and investor education efforts towards this end.


"C. Auditor Capacity

Incorporation of IFRS into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers could strain audit firm resources if sufficient training and time are not provided. The Proposed Roadmap noted that "[a]udit firms would need to consider elements of their systems of quality control, such as their practices related to hiring, assigning personnel to engagements, professional development and advancement activities." An increase in the demand for IFRS expertise may affect the availability of audit services, with consequences on audit quality, cost, and audit firm concentration.

While some commenters expressed that moving to IFRS is likely to have little or no effect on the availability of audit services and audit quality, others expressed concerns about a likely reduction in these areas, along with an increase in both internal and external audit costs, due to IFRS being less comprehensive and requiring more application of judgment.

Others commented that the consequences of a move to IFRS for U.S. issuers on audit firms may differ based on audit firm size. With respect to the large audit firms, commenters believed that a move to IFRS for U.S. issuers is likely to have little or no effect on the availability of audit services and audit quality. Two large audit-firm
commenters noted that they currently audit foreign private issuers as well as subsidiaries of foreign multi-nationals that report under IFRS. Further, they anticipated leveraging personnel from other member firms in countries that have already moved to IFRS.

On the other hand, opinions were mixed on the impact of moving to IFRS on "smaller" audit firms. The Proposed Roadmap stated that the potential use of IFRS by U.S. issuers:
[M]ay be particularly challenging for less globally-oriented audit firms, which typically may have fewer resources available through affiliated or network firms located in jurisdictions in which issuers already report in accordance with IFRS. This could be a further factor affecting concentration in the auditing profession.

One commenter expressed concern that current IFRS expertise is concentrated within the "Big Four" public accounting firms, which could allow for opportunistic business behaviors when dealing with other competitors and regulators. However, others commented that an SEC mandate to move to IFRS would not affect the competitive position of smaller firms.

In light of these differing views, the Staff will analyze for the Commission"s benefit potential auditor capacity constraints with respect to IFRS and their consequences, should the Commission determine in the future to incorporate IFRS into the financial reporting system for U.S. issuers. Specifically, the Staff will:

Analyze concerns regarding auditor capacity constraints, including the effect on audit quality, cost, and audit firm concentration and competitiveness.
Determine possible approaches to mitigate these concerns and the extent of, logistics for, and estimated time necessary to undertake these approaches."

SEC, IFRS, GAAP, Work Plan, Road Map, Transition, International Standards, FASB, Audit Firms
]]>02.25.20101:09 pm02.23.20102:38

Huron Consulting Group Inc. just released its full year 2009 financial numbers, with full year 2009 revenues of $663.9 million (before reimbursable expenses), growing 7.9% from full year 2008 revenues of $573.8 million (before reimbursable expenses). For the Q4-2009 quarter, revenues of $162.9 million, decreased 0.7% from Q4-2008 revenues of $164.0 million. On a GAAP basis, full year 2009 net income was a loss of $(32.9) million compared to a net income of $10.1 million for full year 2008. On a per share basis, full year 2009 was a loss of $(1.63) compared to full year 2008 diluted earnings per share of $0.53. Dragging 2009 net income lower was a 2009 goodwill impairment charge of $67.0 million and restatement-related expenses of $17.5 million.

In general, these results were ahead of Wall Street expectations.

However, gross income (which we compute as revenues minus direct costs) were $228 million in 2009 higher than the comparable figure of $201 million in 2008. Full year non-GAAP adjusted diluted earnings per share was $3.24 compared to $3.47 in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA was $144.0 million, or 21.7% of revenues including discontinued operations, compared to $150.7 million, or 24.5% of revenues including discontinued operations, for the same period last year.

Huron"s average number of full-time billable consultants increased 7.8% to 1,386 for the full year 2009 compared to 1,286 for 2008. The average number of full-time equivalent professionals was 860 for the full year 2009 compared to 834 for 2008. Full-time billable consultant utilization rate was 68.5% during full year 2009 compared with 67.7% during the same period last year. Average billing rate per hour for full-time billable consultants was $270 for the full year 2009 compared to $260 for the same period last year.

Health and Education Consulting had strong growth, while revenues in Legal Consulting fell and in Financial Consulting, revenues declined sharply.

As many may recall, Huron had to restate its 2006, 2007 and 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 financial results to account for the wrong accounting for certain acquisition-related payments received by selling shareholders of four acquired businesses, and this was completed on August 17, 2009, Huron completed the restatement. In addition, Huron took a goodwill impairment charge in Q3-2009 for $106.0 million non-cash pretax charge with $67.0 million relates to continuing operations and $39.0 million relates to discontinued operations (the Galt division which was sold in Q4-2009).

Outlook for 2010

Huron expects full year 2010 revenues to be between $600.0 million to $640.0 million; 2010 EBITDA of $98.5 million to $106.0 million; adjusted EBITDA of $107.0 million to $114.5 million, GAAP diluted EPS of $1.55 to $1.75, and non-GAAP adjusted diluted EPS of $2.00 to $2.20.

Let"s dig into some of the numbers and provide some color on these results:

The sales increase of $55 million from 2008 to 2009, a good 8%, shows the strength of Huron"s customer franchise, despite the tough economy, it is able to increase the top line by selling value-added services at a nice clip and able to service and further penetrate its client base. The increase in $28 million of gross margin also shows that that direct costs are also nicely in control. At the operating income line, after backing out all the one-time charges, 2009 adjusted operating income was $80 million (12.7% of revenue before reimbursable expenses) compared to 2009 adjusted operating income of $52 million (9% of revenue before reimbursable expenses), a nice increase of $28 million in dollar terms and a good 3.7% improvement in percentage terms too.

The drop in adjusted EBITDA margin from 2008 to 2009 is troubling though, showing some deterioration in producing dollar margin from dollar sales.

Huron's outlook for 2010 at nearly flat sales but lower EBITDA is likely the most troublesome part for investors to digest. An increase in 2010 is to be expected for consulting firms as the global economy moves towards recovery. Analysts were expecting $669 million in revenues for 2010 much higher than Huron's outlook though Huron's guidance for EPS of $2.00 to $2.20 is higher than analyst consensus of $1.93.



Wall Street seems to have done an about turn on expectations going forward, while bottom line earnings were the sole focus of investors in the recent past, the whole story is now focused on the top line. Investors are now looking for sales growth, and increases in revenues from additional sales or widgets sold to customers, not on how much the company has controlled costs. Wall Street is now looking for companies to grow to create value, not shrink to retain value.

So not surprisingly, investors were not wowed by the beat of 2009 expectations, but seemed to set their sights on 2010 revenues and beyond, and the tepid revenue outlook did its part to dissuade stock buyers. The stock today Feb 23, 2010 is now a whopping 9% below on its closing price from yesterday Feb 22, 2010.


2009 revenue, Huron Consulting Group, outlook, restatement, shares
]]>02.23.201012:09 pm
This is a big surprise for all, as people grapple with a recent announcement that Yvo De Boer, Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, will be leaving his position to join KPMG.

Yvo De Boer is a global expert on climate change and sustainability, was the prime mover behind the recent climate summit in Copenhagen, which was not entirely successful in meeting its goals, and fell short of a binding agreement to replace the prior Kyoto Protocol

De Boer is resigning after nearly four years at his post, a period marked by good intentions but little progress, as diplomats struggled to find a new global warming deal, but without success. De Boer joins KPMG July 1 as Global Advisor on Climate and Sustainability, only five months before all the 193 nations are scheduled to meet again in Cancun, Mexico for another shot at a worldwide accord on controlling greenhouse gases. After a major personal effort to make this summit, De Boer was openly deeply disappointed, physically exhausted and personally depressed with the failure of the summit in Copenhagen, which drew a prominent crowd, but they only argued about who was to bell the cat on GHG control. And the conference resulted only in vague promise by several countries to limit carbon emissions. He reportedly said, "We were about an inch away from a formal agreement. It was basically in our grasp, but it didn't happen. So that was a pity."

What was a failure for international diplomacy is turning out to be a benefit for capitalism.

Mr. De Boer seems to place more faith on private enterprise, and is willing to throw his lot into companies that can actually make real changes driven by the capitalistic imperative, albeit at a micro level. He says aptly, "Although it is the role of governments to provide the necessary policy frameworks, I have always maintained that business will deliver the necessary innovation and solutions, providing the right conditions are created. With KPMG, I now have a chance to help make that happen."

So, getting an acknowledged global authority on climate change and sustainability, with universal name recognition and tremendous capability to open doors is a big win for KPMG. According to KPMG, De Boer will have an international role working with KPMG member firms in advising business, governments and other organizations on sustainability issues.

There is increasing impact of climate change on business, and our recent blog post discussed the recent SEC interpretive guidance and its consequences for organizations. In years to come, all kinds of companies will have to deal with emissions, carbon management, greenhouse gases, sustainability initiatives, both on the operating side and on the reporting side. Which opens the door for knowledgeable consultants to get work by providing expertise to manage through fairly uncertain waters.

The Big Four firms have already seen this trend and are taking steps to manage and benefit from the future agenda on this topic.

Its not clear whether Mr. De Boer talked to the other Big Four firms, and how he selected KPMG as his home. But it appears that he will have a large championship role at KPMG, meeting with client CEOs as appropriate to ensure KPMG is hired for any organizational or reporting projects on sustainability or climate change. According to KPMG"s Global Head of Advisory Alan Buckle, "Yvo De Boer will have a key role in developing a sustainability framework for our firms" clients, and will – without question – bring our insights to a new level." Which of course, means a dedicated service line, thought leadership, consulting frameworks with Advisory revenue to boot.

We"ll continue to watch this space, and see how the other Big Four firms react, either to bring on marquee outside luminaries, or forge other competitive steps.

And we"ll see if KPMG can make a splash with the world"s largest companies to adopt and champion the green agenda, of course with the firm"s consulting assistance.


Yvo De Boer, KPMG, Climate Change, UN, Sustainability, UNFCCC, Advisor
]]>02.19.20103:00 pm

Our staff writer Scott Cytron, reviews below the strategies non-Big Four firms are using to increase revenues in this environment....



Non-Big Four Firms Increase Focus on Revenue Growth Strategies

Tactics include outsourced business, increasing advisory services and retaining quality talent

By Scott H. Cytron, ABC



Although accounting is often thought of as a recession-proof industry, Big4.com"s 2009 Big Four Firms Performance Analysis released in January 2010 paints a somewhat different picture in revenues, personnel and service delivery.



In the face of very difficult external conditions, all Big Four firms (Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers) experienced annual declines in revenues from 2008 to 2009. However, the study expects that 2010 performance will be better, though it"s debatable whether a repeat of multiple years of double-digit growth will be possible in the future.



What does this mean for any firm smaller than a Big Four? In this challenging environment for the accounting industry, large regional firms, and small- and medium-sized firms, have to come up with innovative strategies to grow their top line. Focusing on client needs, expanding beyond traditional audit and tax services, outsourcing activities from the Big Four, and employee engagement are four tactics smaller firms are using to increase revenues this year.



"Smaller firms should proactively target and solicit clients from larger firms that may be open to a cost saving – a result of the economy that may not have been there two years ago," says Arlis Esnough, president of the Association for Accounting Administration (AAA) and firm administrator for Hansen, Jergenson, Nergaard & Co., LLP in Minneapolis, Minn. "Smaller firms also need to increase their exposure, especially where they can showcase technical knowledge, as well as get the firm and its principals known and in front of their target market and community."



Esnough says many businesses must understand what they need, as well the kind of firm that can provide the best solutions. There are choices: deciding between the personal touch and the kind of direct partner contact a small CPA firm offers, or choosing a large CPA firm with more expensive fees to buy the higher-level knowledge and experience.



"Smaller firms can be more competitive in pricing services," says Esnough. "Making firm principals available to prospects and clients is a good way to demonstrate an improved service model. Be proactive, responsive and committed to deadlines. This demonstrates a services model that many larger firms, with higher leverage, can sometimes struggle to provide."



Big Four firms have been proactively growing their advisory service lines. In 2004, Advisory Services constituted 22 percent of combined firm revenues. In 2009, in a span of just five years, this grew to 28 percent, making advisory services the fastest growing source of revenues outside audit and tax.



Certainly, regional and local firms continually rely on advisory services to build revenues, often cross-selling these services from a firm"s tax and assurance client base.



"Just being a compliance provider is a losing proposition; without advisory services such as litigation support, bankruptcy consulting, business valuations and other management consulting services, clients will ultimately move on," says Michael I. Daszkal, CPA, managing partner of Daszkal Bolton, LLP, a full-service firm in South Florida. "The key to communicating this information is to consistently provide clients and referral partners with a steady and focused stream of information about the value the firm can offer. For example, we recently rolled out an aggressive program to push our advisory business to existing clients in an effort to expand fees, but more importantly, to keep them happy."



Similar to most other accounting practices in markets where the Big Four also have offices, firms of all sizes with specialty practices or niche interests exchange or take on outsourced business from large firms – an unusual, but quite profitable additional source of revenues for smaller firms. Dawn Hanna Bell, immediate past president of the AAA and firm administrator for Wright, Griffin, Davis and Company in Ann Arbor, Mich., says smaller firm partners should create personal relationships with partners in larger firms in order to capture some of this outsourced business.



"This would facilitate larger firms feeling more confident and comfortable with the concept of outsourcing to smaller firms," she says. "Having a specific area or specialty to offer for outsourcing and communicating this to larger firms would help. In addition, keep staff aware and communicate the connection with alumni from their schools."



Big Four firms have outsourced benefit plan audits, tax compliance, internal control outsourcing, SOX 404 and international tax to Daszkal Bolton.



"In my experience. there is an art form to selling to the Big Four," says Daszkal. "In our case, we use our Big Four-type talent, quick response times and reasonable fee structure to keep prominent in the minds of Big Four referral sources. Since our firm has a large number of former Big Four professionals, we are able to work through multiple channels to stay connected and identify outsourced opportunities as they arise."



Finding talented professionals – and retaining them for the partner level in Big Four firms – remains an ever-present issue. According to the Report"s findings, there are about 34,000 partners in all the Big Four firms overseeing a steep pyramid of about 470,000 professionals.



In contrast, smaller firms offer a faster track to partnership, with these partners managing fewer associates. This provides a conducive professional environment and, eventually, a higher level of client service.



"The road to partnership in the Big Four is a tough and long process," says Daszkal. "Our firm culture has facilitated an environment that allows us to attract Big Four alumni looking to fast track their career. Like other firms, we do this through work-life balance and competitive pay, but we also tout the fact that smaller firms can find quicker, often more viable opportunities in middle-market companies the Big Four can"t serve. There are a greater number of companies to pursue."



As the economy improves and business escalates, all accounting firms, no matter their size, will no doubt be closely monitoring the marketplace for additional sources of revenue. The leaders will be the firms who remain innovative in their approaches to retain clients, while continuing to market their services to prospects and referral sources.



For more information, download a complete copy of the Big Four Firms Performance Analysis. http://www.big4.com/media_kit/big4_media_kit.pdf



Scott H. Cytron, ABC, is a frequent contributor to industry publications covering professional services industries, including accounting, healthcare, financial planning, collections and debt, and high-tech. He is a staff writer for Big4.com and works with many CPA firms to increase their recruitment and retention efforts through communications and marketing strategies. Visit his blog at www.absolutecytron.com, and contact him at scott@cytronandcompany.com.



non Big Four, accounting firms, revenues, strategies, partnerships, Big Four Firm performance study

]]>02.19.201012:21 pm
Capgemini S.A. just released its full year 2009 audited results today, with 2009 revenues at EUR 8.371 billion down 3.9% from 2008 revenues of EUR 8.710 billion in Euro terms. On constant currency terms, 2009 revenues were down 5.5% from 2008.

Here are some other highlights:

2009 operating margin of EUR 595 billion (7.1% of sales) was down from 2008 operating margin of EUR 744 billion (8.5% of sales). Operating margin% was in line with previous Capgemini guidance. 2009 net income of EUR 178 million fell from 2008 net income of EUR 774 million. Operating margin in the second half of 2009 was better than the first half of 2009 due to a better business environment. Net cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 totaled € 1,269 million, up an impressive EUR 800 million from € 495 million at end-2008. Capgemini will pay a dividend of € 0.80 per share at the next Ordinary Shareholders Meeting (rather than the previous EUR 1.00 per share)

Capgemini put a positive spin on these results, saying, " The consulting and IT services market, which had demonstrated remarkable resistance in 2008, slowed considerably in 2009. In this context, Capgemini successfully contained the decrease in revenues thanks to the stability of its outsourcing business, …as well as demand in public sector as well as the energy and utilities sector."

2009 bookings were € 9.280 billion, down only 2% from 2008. In Outsourcing Services, bookings soared 14% and operating margin% improved from 5.4% to 7.2%. Booking in other service lines were at acceptable levels.

By geographic region, revenues in France dropped 6.1%, and operating margin rate of 6.2% fell from 7.2% in 2008. In United Kingdom and Ireland, revenue actually rose 7.5%, and posted the highest operating margin of 8.9%. Revenues in North America fell 8.5% on constant currency terms, but only 4.7% in Euro terms, with operating margin at 4.9%, down only 0.6% from 2008. In Benelux, revenues plummeted 12.9% like-for-like, but the region had a high 2009 operating margin rate of 8.7% and even a double-digit rate in H2-2009. In other regions revenues fell 7.6% on average like-for-like (Italy and Asia-Pacific having remarkable growth); with an average operating margin rate of 10.4% mainly due to profitability of Asia-Pacific.

By service line, Outsourcing Services, 36.4% of revenues, grew 0.3% like-for-like, and operating margin rate improved to 7.2%. Technology Services had 7.4% fall in revenues, like-for-like and an operating margin rate down on 2008 at 6.9%. Sogeti had 8.3% drop in revenues like-for-like, but with a good operating margin of 9.7%. Consulting Services, revenues fell 14.7% like-for-like, but had quite remarkable operating margin of 11.4%, down from 12.8% in 2008.

Capgemini had a total headcount of 90,516 on December 31, 2009, compared to 91,621 at end-2008. There were 28,000 offshore employees, 31% of the total headcount on December 31, 2009.

2010 Outlook

Capgemini was quite optimistic, at least on the revenue side for 2010. It said, "While the IT services market was hit, particularly in the second half of 2009, by a substantial slump in demand, it would appear to be stabilizing in the first half of 2010. The Group has, in particular, noted a significant increase in the appetite of clients for larger projects and, in several geographical areas, a turnaround in the attrition rate, which generally reflects an upturn in activity. As comparative figures for the first half of 2009 remain high, Capgemini will record a further fall in revenues in the first half of 2010, before a return to growth in the second half of the year. For 2010 as a whole, the Group forecasts a slight contraction of between 2 and 4% on a like-for-like basis, with an operating margin rate of between 6 and 6.5%."


Here's our take:

Capgemini had been signalling for a while now that both 2009 revenues and profits would be falling from 2008. 2009 revenues were expected to fall by 3 to 4% and operating margin was expected at 7%. So the year end 2009 actual results were not out too much out of line with Capgemini's previous guidance. What was heartening was the huge growth in Outsourcing with bookings up 14% and sales also up 0.3%, clearly this is providing the counter to the drop in other businesses, as cost-constrained clients look for lower prices from offshore entities.

The second half does look better on a profitability perspective with operating margins in H2-2009 at 7.7% compared to 6.6% in H1-2009, this could be the impact of better operating external environment plus the timing effect of previous restructuring activity. A huge increase of Eur 800 million additional cash on hand shows the company's strong and defensive financial position, though the drop in dividend per share is a bit concerning. On the headcount front, good to see Capgemini increasing employees, indicating a more positive outlook this year, as this being a leading index of more expected business in a consulting firm. Also noteworthy is the high growth in Asia Pacific and the corresponding high profitability in that region, indicating that this area is the growth engine for all large multinationals.

The 2010 outlook of 2-4% drop in revenues and 6-6.5% operating margin, essentially indicates that this year will be a slight contraction from 2009 on all fronts. However, the expected return to growth in H2-2010 is encouraging, laying the groundwork for a better 2011.

According to Paul Hermelin, Capgemini CEO, in the Financial Times, "Demand is still relatively mediocre, but there are signs of a thaw. We are seeing far less price negotiation and we are starting to see bigger systems integration deals in the pipeline. It has been mainly €2m to €10m deals last year but now there is a surge for €10m to €50m deals." Mr Hermelin added that he was still determined to make a number of acquisitions in the US to boost Capgemini"s presence in the market, where it languishes in 17th position by size. Mr Hermelin has previously said he would like the company to be among the top five in the US.

So all in all, this was a result slightly better than expectations, but the encouraging outlook on the business environment, boost in hiring, upturn in H2-2010 all proved to be positive signs, which more than offset the tepid financial performance expected in 2010. Investors were clearly looking past this year and into the next few, as CAP shares on Euronext first went down 4% on opening to EUR 30.40 per share, and then reversed course to end the day at EUR 33.65 per share, up 6.2% for the day. The 10% whopping gain from lows to highs for the day were a result of investors getting more comfortable with the company's outlook.

Capgemini (PARIS: CAP.PA), 2009, earnings results, full year, 2009 revenue, operating margin, outsourcing,
]]>02.18.20103:19 pm
We blog about the Oscars and PricewaterhouseCoopers each year, check out our previous blog posts below

http://bigfouralumni.blogspot.com/2009/02/pricewaterhousecoopers-celebrates-75.html
http://bigfouralumni.blogspot.com/2007/02/pwc-auditors-defend-oscar-secrets-james.html

This year, the 82nd Annual Academy Awards will be given out Sunday evening, March 7, 2010, just a few weeks away, and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP counts ballots again for the 76th consecutive year for the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. The two audit partners, Brad Oltmanns and Rick Rosas will again lead the process, and you will note these two gentleman generally carrying a black briefcase on the red carpet (we"ve seen them occasionally) just before all the awards are given They have the distinction of being the only two people in the world to know the true identity of winners before the envelopes are opened.

For all these year, the largest accounting firm on the planet has kept the world"s biggest secret without a single security breach and following the same hand-counting procedure.

However, this time the Oscars have changed, instead of having just 5 nominees for the Best Picture, there are now 10 and the winner will be selected through the preferential voting system.

The counting is all top secret, there are an unknown set of auditors in an undisclosed location who hand count each ballot. Only the top 2 honchos know the full story, even those who count are unaware of how the process works in its entirety, they are as in the dark as you and I.

Here"s how it works
5,777 voting members of the Academy get nomination ballots in the mail in December 2009. Their votes are due by 5 p.m. Pacific Time on January 23, 2010, a very strict deadline. Ten days later, on February 2, the nominees were announced. Final ballots will be mailed on February 10, 2010, due by 5 p.m. PT on March 2, 2010.

For the rest, PricewaterhouseCoopers says it best, "All completed ballots are delivered to PricewaterhouseCoopers. The balloting leaders then manually tabulate the responses according to Academy rules. As a precautionary measure, two complete sets of envelopes bearing winners" names are prepared and brought by PricewaterhouseCoopers partners to the ceremony via separate, secret routes. As a second precautionary measure, the PricewaterhouseCoopers balloting leaders also memorize the names of the award winners. Identities of Oscar recipients are kept confidential until they are announced during the live telecast. During the show, Oltmanns and Rosas remain backstage and hand the envelopes to award presenters just before they walk onstage."

Here are some additional fun facts on this exercise:

450,000+: The approximate number of ballots counted by PricewaterhouseCoopers in 76 years on the job.
2,550+: The number of winners' envelopes stuffed since the envelope system was introduced in 1941.
1,700: The approximate number of "person-hours" it takes the PricewaterhouseCoopers team every year to count and verify the ballots by hand.
34: The number of broadcasts PricewaterhouseCoopers" partners have appeared on since 1953
24: The number of awards categories to be tabulated for the 82nd Academy Awards at a secret location known only to the members of the small PricewaterhouseCoopers ballot team.
7: The number of days it takes to count the ballots for nominations.
3: The number of days it takes to count the final ballots.

Of course, this year, with James Cameron"s Avatar being such a big blockbuster, its hard to imagine that it does not get a large number of Oscars, including being the current favorite for Best Picture.

As we have said before, this is probably the height of glamour for green-shaded auditors, and when you watch the envelopes being opened by the presenters, know that they and the rest of the world have absolutely no clue whose name it is on the inside.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, Oscars, Academy Awards, Avatar, ballots, presenters, count, winner, Best Picture

]]>02.11.20102:11 pm
Climate change has increasingly become an important global concern, impacting individuals, companies and even governments, as everyone tries to understand their part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

At the business level, climate change and management of carbon can have significant financial and legal implications. Recognizing this, various regulatory and voluntary agencies (like the Carbon Disclosure Project) have been moving the ball forward on how companies can disclose the business risks associated with climate change to their investors and other stakeholders and measure and report their greenhouse gas emissions.

In this context, the SEC recently released an interpretive guidance on existing SEC disclosure requirements on business or legal developments as they apply to the topical and critical issue of climate change. In other words, the SEC has published new guidance for companies that disclose material risks related to climate change which can impact their business operations and financials. Investors have been long pushing for such information. They understand that risks associated with climate change, such as management of carbon for large-scale emitters, likely has impact on shareholder value, but have been unable quite yet to fully quantify and assess these effects. The SEC guidance provides more clarity to investors on what they can expect from corporate disclosures. The entire SEC interpretive guidance can be downloaded from the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/2010/33-9106.pdf

Interestingly, the SEC is not saying that there IS climate change in our planet, leaving that contentious discussion to environmental scientist and their critics. According to SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, "We are not opining on whether the world's climate is changing, at what pace it might be changing, or due to what causes." The SEC is just making it easier for companies and accountants to report their numbers.

We had the opportunity for an interesting chat with Ms. Kathy Nieland, the US Sustainability and Climate Change Partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, an expert on this topic, to get a better understanding of how this SEC action impacts public companies.

According to Ms. Nieland, what really sets this interpretive guidance apart is the applicability of this regulation to a larger set of companies due to its broad definition of business and financial risks relating to climate change. There is a lot of uncertainty out there about what constitutes climate change risk and how to report on it, and the recent SEC guidance goes a long way to clarify the issue.

Ms. Nieland said to us, quite aptly, that this is not a new issue for utilities, petrochemical companies, manufacturers and other heavy industrials, who have been on the forefront of measuring the costs and impacts of climate change. But this does clarify what investors can expect, and helps all types of companies, even those who have not yet been concerned, to identify potential areas for disclosure.

The key factor which decides whether disclosure is necessary is the level of materiality. If any aspect of climate change data crosses the materiality threshold, then the company must disclose risks and opportunities which may affect investor analysis. Ms. Nieland expects in due course, nearly all public companies will have to do a comprehensive assessment of climate change, a territory unfamiliar to many organizations. After which, they will need to assess which risks, if any, are material enough to disclose in their annual reports.

The SEC guidance provides a good roadmap to embark on this journey. Some businesses, such as hospitals, casinos or banks, may think that they do not face material risk because they are not large-scale emitters, but they may still need to examine other related risks, such as the risk of rising sea levels on their real estate holdings or any portfolio risk. Large-scale emitters, such as utilities and power companies are already far along the road. Ms. Nieland correctly surmises that the middle-of-the-road companies, high users of electricity or having moderate levels of emissions, are the ones who will likely invest resources to analyze their supply chains, input costs, product pricing and asset qualities.

On the legislative front, there is fitful progress on federal cap and trade legislation, which would govern who and how carbon emission credits will be set and traded. The passage of such legislation at the federal level, or the imposition of a carbon tax, according to Ms. Nieland, will be the critical point which will set into motion a wide variety of subsequent actions. Currently, reporting standards are being addressed in an evolutionary manner. Once the law is passed, accounting and reporting standards will need to quickly align themselves with legal requirements.

While all this may be interesting, why should you care about Climate Change?

Besides the obvious answers, consider this – you may end up paying higher prices for products that you consume; you may start a company to take advantage of new opportunities created by carbon management; your company may land a big contract to retrofit an old asset; or your bank may be involved in a huge financing deal for a clean technology start up.

The impacts are quite far reaching. Climate Change may have implications for your job and finances that are quite hard to imagine today.

And we"ll keep blogging on this topic as it develops further.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, Climate Change, SEC, guidance, sustainability, greenhouse gases, emissions, carbon tax, cap and trade
]]>02.10.201011:02 am
We have blogged earlier about PricewaterhouseCoopers, the official auditors of Satyam, the Indian IT firm, scalded by the scam perpetrated by its Chairman Ramalinga Raju. Since then, Satyam has been bought by Tech Mahindra and Deloitte has been hired as the new statutory auditors. All this has happened in a space of one year, with Ramalinga Raju being arrested on January 9, 2009, he is reportedly in the hospital now, though his brother and the Satyam CFO and other key officials are still imprisoned.

This case continues to twist and turn, and here are some very recent developments from the Indian press (mainly The Economic Times (www.economictimes.com) and CNBC-TV18 (www.moneycontrol.com):

First and most recent, the Supreme Court of India today granted bail to the PricewaterhouseCoopers partner Mr. T Srinivas, on the basis that the bulky charges (over 55,000 pages) could lead to a long-drawn trial in the case and the accused was already lodged in jail for over a year. The judges decided it would be of no use to keep the accused in jail, where he had been since his arrest on January 24 2009. Mr. Srinivas has been asked to post bail of about US$40,000 and two sureties. The court also directed Mr. Srinivas to appear before the police in the first week of every second month and not to tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses in the case.

Second, the scam has had larger impact on the PwC Indian firm, with about 200 professionals leaving PwC India for other firms, mainly due to adverse reputational impact. This is considered one of the highest and quickest attritions in Indian professional services. These 200 employees include the 19 partners who left along with Dinesh Kanabar, the widely-regarded head of PwC"s tax practice, who joined rival firm KPMG as deputy CEO in December 2009. These employees, across all level of professional services, have apparently moved onto other Big Four firms in India - KPMG, Ernst & Young and Deloitte. Reportedly, PwC has been trying to control attrition by attractive bonuses and larger professional roles. Note that PwC India has 6,500 employees, so this 3% by itself is not an unusual attrition level, but the rapid outflow in a short amount of time following a reputational event makes it all the more critical.

Third, recall that PwC India had made serious changes to the top management of the Indian firm, also bringing in Gautam Banerjee as the new Chairman from PwC Singapore in December 2009.

Fourth, in a recent interview with Dennis Nally PwC Chairman with CNBC-TV18 India TV, he acknowledged that the Satyam scam had hurt the PwC brand, saying, "Without question the firm has had real challenges in India but that has not changed my outlook and view on the importance of India economy to global economic picture….It is going to take sustained performance and nothing short of that. Everything we do is a matter of focus. …If we do that and we do that consistently over a period of time the PwC brand in India will be as strong and as good as it has been in the past and where we want it to be into the future."

So this case moves on, leaving behind tons of collateral damage for all concerned. We can all ask how the auditors could have missed lining up company statements against bank statements to see whether the cash reported was really in the bank. Relying upon company management, however convincing they may be, should not have precluded independent investigation. That"s true auditing, isn"t it - an unbiased, critical and dispassionate view coupled with focus on the truth and unstinting efforts to show accurate financial information. Till the entire story comes out, we"ll never know what really happened, but deep inquiry at the right time could have prevented this crisis and taken it out at the bud.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, India, Satyam Computers, audit, bail, Ramalinga Raju
]]>02.04.20104:24 pm
We recently published our extensive financial analysis on the Big Four Firms (download at http://www.big4.com/media_kit/big4_media_kit.pdf), and with some recent revenue announcements by the next set of firms, here is a brief overview of The Next Four, the second set of international but smaller accounting firms.

As you can see below, these are large complex organizations in their own right, and likely to place in the global Fortune 500 as independent entities. They are multi-billion dollar, multi-firm, transnational enterprises, with presence in 100+ countries, and providing a wide variety of accounting, tax and advisory services. In another industry, they would be good contenders for top positions, but the sheer size of each of the Big Four firms totally dwarfs their presence in the accounting & tax firm sector. Consider that the combined revenue of these four firms (~$16 billion) is less than the revenue of the smallest of the Big Four firms (KPMG at $20 billion).

To recap:

First, PricewaterhouseCoopers, still the largest firm in the industry
Second, Deloitte, just a bit behind PwC
Third, Ernst & Young
Fourth, KPMG, the smallest of the Big Four firms

Fifth, and a distant follower to KPMG is BDO International, which had total combined fee income for all BDO Member Firms of US$ 5.026 billion for the year ended 30 September 2009, a creditable year over year increase of 1.7 % in euro terms but a decrease of 2.3 % in US dollars terms. In local currency terms, excluding the effect of all currency movements, revenues actually increased 4.5%, with the appreciating US dollar reducing this by about 7% when results were reported in US dollars from 2008 to 2009.

Europe and North America both decreased combined fee income, but Asia Pacific, Middle East and Sub Saharan Africa regions each had an increase of some 20% in Euro terms. Latin America grew by almost 10% in Euro terms.

Audit & Accounting grew by 4.5%, Tax fell by 3.9% and Advisory services fell by 10%. The total number of people increased from 44,002 in 2008 to 46,035 in 2009, while the network"s offices grew from 1,095 to 1,138 over the same period.

In recent news BDO Seidman, the US member firm, simply became BDO.


Sixth, and jumping over Grant Thornton to take that sixth spot is RSM International with 2009 worldwide revenues of US$3.87 billion, up a solid 8% from 2008. Of this global revenue, Americas have US$2.65 billion, Europe has US$837 million, Asia Pacific has US$349 million; and Africa & Middle East with a small figure of US$36.8 million. RSM International has 32,492 people, comprised of 3,150 partners, 23,262 professional and 6,080 administrative staff in 736 offices in 76 countries.

There were some bright spots for RSMI which led to this increase. In 2009, Singapore and China revenues rose 31% and 17% respectively, with good showings from Philippines, New Zealand, Indonesia and Malaysia. Revenues in Belgium shot up 69% due to a local merger while member firms in Malta and Portugal also grew by over 25 percent each. RSM Tenon, the newly merged UK member firm, increased the UK firm revenues to US$406 million.

RSMI"s 8% increase in revenue was a key factor in displacing Grant Thornton from sixth place, as Grant Thornton"s revenue went the other way, dropping by 9%.


Seventh, and just behind RSM International is Grant Thornton International (losing that sixth spot), with combined global revenues of $3.6 billion from its 96 member firms for the year ended 30 September 2009. Revenues for 2009 were flat in local currency terms from 2008, but declined 9% in US dollar terms from 2008.

Assurance revenues at $1.6 billion (46% of total revenues) increased 5% in local currency terms but dropped 4% in US dollar terms against 2008. Tax revenues of $763 million (~25% of total) were flat to 2008 in local currency terms but were down 9% in US dollar terms. Specialist advisory services revenues were $884 million (25% of global dollar revenues), down 5% in local currency but down 16% in US dollar terms

Latin America and the Caribbean had solid local currency growth of 13%. Europe, Middle East & Africa revenues were flat at local currency terms. Greece (up 11%), Poland (12%) and Belgium (19%) were top performers. 2009 North American revenues were down 1% from 2008. Asia Pacific revenues were up by 14% at constant exchange rates, helped by a 23% increase in revenues by the India member firm.

Grant Thornton"s 9% drop in revenue led to its displacement as the sixth largest accounting firm in the world. An unexpected surprise indeed.


In Eighth place is Baker Tilly International with 145 member firms in 110 countries and 2,800+ partners and 25,000 people. Baker Tilly"s revenues for fiscal year 2008 were US$2.95 billion, up 18% from 2007. We could not find Baker Tilly"s 2009 revenues, but presume they were higher than 2008.


According to the recently published rankings of 40 accounting organizations from the International Accounting Bulletin's annual world survey, average network revenues dropped 6% to $122 billion and average association revenues increased only 3% to $20.8 billion. The Bulletin says that this is a nearly a 20% revenue turnaround for networks with some of the largest firms affected, corroborating our earlier analysis of the Big 4 firms. Only two firms in the top 10 - RSM International and Baker Tilly were able to increase their revenues from 2008 to 2009.

The Bulletin further noted that Audit demand was affected by severe fee reductions, as high as 40% in come cases. Tax demand suffered as clients generally paid less tax, affecting the appetite for tax planning advice. But the most impacted was corporate finance with 2009 being the worst year for M&A deals since 2004. Restructuring services were in good demand. Most firms noted heavy investment in Asia-Pacific, with Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Latin America reporting solid growth.

The IAB predicts, as we did in our analysis, "If the networks" recent growth trends continue, Deloitte will overtake PwC this year."

Note that the revenues for the Big Four firms fell 7% from $101 billion in 2008 to $94 billion in 2009. In 2009, it is interesting to note that the total global revenues of all the other 36+ large accounting firms combined were only $26 billion ($122 billion minus $94 billion). And the 6% drop in the industry is largely defined by the 7% drop in the mega Big Four firms (PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte, Ernst & Young and KPMG).

The IAB"s analyis is in sync with our findings, and the big surprise is clearly RSMI"s move to the sixth spot, swapping places with Grant Thornton. We shall look out to next year where there are two close races: Deloitte versus PricewaterhouseCoopers to be the largest accounting firm on the planet and RSMI versus Grant Thornton for sixth and seventh spots.

BDO, RSM International, Grant Thornton, Baker Tilly, International Accounting Bulletin

]]>02.04.20103:12 pm
Ernst and Young just came out with some survey results which suggest that the overwhelmingly positive outcomes we have seen from recent PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG global surveys needs to be tempered with a bit of caution.

While the firm finds that the situation is drastically different in December 2009 as compared to December 2008, there is some element of hesitation on part of executives to declare that all is bright again on the horizon. Leaders still seem to be a bit nervous about the recovery and companies are tiptoeing cautiously into 2010.

In January 2009, 75% of companies were focused on their own survival and only 19% were trying to leverage the recession to pursue new market opportunities. But by end of that year December 2009, 34% were considering pursuing new opportunities; but get this – over half (53%) of companies still agreed that surviving 2010 would still remain a challenge.

John Murphy, Global Managing Partner - Markets, Ernst & Young aptly said, "The spirit of optimism has increased, but it is essentially fragile in nature. A pick up in confidence is not surprising, given the massive global government stimulus working its way through the economy and the larger developing and emerging economies beginning to rebound. Companies may be less worried about survival over the next 12 months, but the return to a healthy operating environment is still some way off."

But all was not bad, 33% of companies increased their EBITDA by over 5% in the last 12 months. And further, 7% of all businesses had seen a more than 20% increase in earnings. This trend seems to be more prevalent in mid-sized companies in the relatively robust Asia-Pacific region, with 45% reporting a 5% EBITDA increase, in Latin America (26%), Western Europe (28%) and Eastern Europe (29%) the proportion was lower. 40% of pharmaceutical, aerospace and defense and banking companies exceeded the 5% growth threshold. Companies in the oil and gas, manufacturing and automotive sectors were far more likely to report flat or declining earnings.

While the worst of the crisis is over, a good 33% saw revenue growth returning within six months, one-third said by the start of 2011 and the final third not for at least two years. After all the cost cutting is done, the path to value clearly lies through revenue growth, what Ernst and Young calls the "growth crisis". 64% thought optimizing the markets they serve via new market entry, new products or new channels, and through revitalizing the business model with new thinking around organizational structure, core competencies and new business collaborations.

In typical consultingese, Ernst and Young reveals its 9-sided "performance wheel" which includes all the actions organizations can take to enhance stakeholder value. According to E and Y, high performance companies (taking a page from Accenture"s book) are distinguished from lower performance companies by the emphasis they place on these following parameters AND their capability to execute on the goals they set for these strategies. The four key delineating areas are:

Optimize market reach
Strengthen management talent
Accelerate decision making and execution
Strengthen stakeholder confidence

So this study is partly result reporting and partly prescriptive. The urgency of the current moment creates the imperative to change, change whatever you"re doing for the better in multiple dimensions to continue to be relevant and value-creating.

Our takeaway from this survey is the tinge of realism that is not evident in the glowing results from other firms coupled with the specific directions that successful companies have taken to manage creatively through this downturn. The agenda for change along 9 dimensions can be a bit hard for management to grasp, but a prioritization of elements and then a ruthless focus on what counts can get companies to get better situated for revenue growth and pushing through the lag end of the crisis.

The full study for those interested in the detailed results is at

http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Lessons_from_change_-_Findings_from_the_market/$FILE/EY_Lessons_from_change_-_Findings_from_the_market.pdf

Ernst and Young, 2009 survey, high performance, survey
]]>02.02.20104:35 pm
Coming on the heels of two executive confidence surveys by other Big Four firms, which corroborate general increase in optimism, here"s another data point, this time from the capital markets which further confirms that recovery is imminent.

Ernst & Young LLP"s just released Q4-2009 quarterly US IPO Pipeline report shows that US IPO activity did increase sharply in that quarter, making it the best of the last two years and matching levels we saw before entering this slowdown. Consider that the US economy did grow by around 6%, a record in recent times in the same quarter. 53 companies entered into registration in the quarter, 30 IPOs were launched and the overall pipeline increased to 54, looking for $10.3 billion from the markets. Consider this large 59% jump from just the previous quarter Q3-2009, with 30 new registrants, 14 companies that went public and a resulting pipeline of 34 registrants.

Clearly the IPO market is on the mend. See our previous blog post on the Q3-2009 IPO activity led by China and Brazil. http://bigfouralumni.blogspot.com/2009/10/ipo-activity-rises-in-q3-2009-china.html

The year over year comparisons also show why this quarter was important for the IPO market. In Q4-2009, there were 54 registrants, $10.3 billion of deals with the average deal being $273 million. A year ago, in Q4-2008, there were 57 registrants, $15.5 billion of deals with the average deal being $187 million. Two years ago, in Q4-2007, there were 90 registrants, $16.8 billion of deals with the average deal being $187 million.

So while Q4-2009 was not large in terms of volume, it does represent a big increase over the dismal numbers we have seen in previous few quarters. The big run up in capital market is emboldening private companies to seek capital markets, and on the other side, investors can now think of taking some risk to bring in some returns. And the next few months will likely show much higher activity as positive trends continue.

In terms of US regions, the West was most active with 21 companies in registration to raise $3.6 billion. The Southwest had 5 companies, and looking for $2.4 billion, while the Midwest also with 5 companies sought $1.2 billion. With tech leading the charge, California had the highest level of activity among the 50 states with 18 companies in registration.

According to Jackie Kelley, Ernst & Young LLP, Americas IPO Leader, "Finally, the markets are opening up to represent their historic diversity – a range of deal sizes, pre-recession averaging at about $190 million, and a variety of industries led by technology. The next few months are shaping up to be a key period of activity."

Ernst and Young, IPO, Capital Markets, registration, venture capital, private companies
]]>02.01.20104:54 pm
We just talked about PricewaterhouseCoopers" 13th annual global CEO survey, which showed a remarkable improvement in CEO confidence this year as compared to last year 2008.

Deloitte also has recently come out with a study which validates the general improvement in optimism. In fact, Deloitte says that not only are executives more positive, but that "economic optimism has reached its highest level among surveyed executives since the study"s inception."

That"s encouraging news. More than 33% of the 335 surveyed executives now think the worst of the recession is behind us as organizations are now focused on the right balance between offensive and defensive talent strategies. What this means is companies who were generally using the downturn as an excuse to cut heads or to freeze salaries can no longer look to that option, but have to gear up to either begin to retain existing good talent or to become ready to attract people to join their enterprise. Certainly, this is excellent news for the unemployed, the underemployed and those generally dissatisfied with their current jobs. That today"s news showing the US GDP soared in the fourth quarter of 2009 indicates the economic world is looking up and the worst has passed, and that growth may be just months away. The Deloitte research is focused more on the employment and talent aspect of executive confidence, and given today"s jobs environment, that is exactly the right set of questions to be asking top executives.

According to Jeff Schwartz, principal, Human Capital, Deloitte Consulting LLP, "Looking into the recovery, companies can no longer depend on the recession as their primary retention strategy for keeping critical employees. We expect executives to continue to shift their talent portfolios from ‘defensive" measures, such as cutting headcount and focusing primarily on costs, to ‘offensive" programs, including retention of critical leaders and workers and increased spending on training and development with a focus on leadership."

Here are some key findings:

Companies are (Cautiously) Optimistic
35% of executives predicted the worst of the economic crisis is behind us, which is "the highest level of economic confidence since the survey began in January 2009."

Talent Priorities are Shifting, Albeit Slowly
However, 35% still said reducing employee headcount remains the leading current talent priority, followed by retention (28%) and training and development (25%). Another piece of good news: only 39% of talent managers and executives anticipate additional layoffs in the next three months, compared to 51% who see no layoffs on the horizon.

Training and Development Yield World-Class Talent
40% executives expect their companies to increase programs aimed at developing high potential employees (47%) and cultivating corporate leaders (43%).


We have been saying all along that these horizontal and vertical surveys conducted by the Big Four firms across geographies, industries and time periods are an excellent indicator of how the global economy will perform. All through the last 18 months, we have reported on surveys which reached the lowest levels that we have ever seen, but of late we are now seeing rapid snapbacks in confidence, optimism, positive expectations to unanticipated levels. All this means, that unless everyone is simultaneously wrong, all economies and sectors are improving rapidly in 2010, and good days are not that far away now.

Deloitte, survey, executive optimism, confidence, talent, retention, training, hiring
]]>01.29.201012:18 pm With the new year 2010 just open, the forecasts for the year ahead have started.

First out is KPMG"s Global MA Predictor which estimates that M&A appetite and capacity will move up in the next 12 months, with increased forward PE ratios from a year ago pointing to a higher deal-making appetite. Furthermore, the capacity to do deals is heightened by a decline in net debt to EBITDA ratios from earlier levels.

Let"s just clarify how this predictor works. It looks at forward Price to Earnings (PE) ratios and net debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) multiple to track and establish the potential direction of M&A activity for the world"s 1,000 largest companies by market capitalization; and then looks at these ratios over time. The PE ratio tests for "paper appetite" i.e. the relative preparedness of companies, sectors and regions to originate deals on the basis of share values only. The net debt to EBITDA ratio tests for "debt capacity" – that is, the relative ability of companies, sectors and regions to originate deals using debt only.

Simply put, if the price to earnings ratios for the world"s largest public companies are higher, then their stock (the "currency" to do deals) has more buying power, and they can potentially more deals by issuing higher-priced stock. Simultaneously, if the debt on their books has reduced relative to their operating earnings, then they can take on more debt and still be financially solvent, which again increases their capacity to do acquisitions and issue public debt. The approach is fairly sensible, though statisticians would say these are just necessary, not sufficient conditions for upcoming M&A activity.

At the beginning of 2010, it appears that both ratios are working in favor of better deal making. Forward PE ratios are now at 14.0x for 2010 versus 13.1x for 2009, while net debt to EBITDA ratios are expected to decline by 18% from 1.5x to 1.2x. These factors now indicate a slow but sure enhancement in the global deals market over the next 12 months even though credit markets remain tight.

Looking across the world, Latin America shows the highest increases in PE ratios, moving up 62% from 8.9x to 14.5x, followed by AsiaPacific (exc. Japan) at 35%, Africa & the Middle East at 13%, Europe at 7% and North America at 4%.

On the other indicator, net debt to EBITDA ratios, Africa & the Middle East forecasts a 37% decline (down from 0.8x to 0.5x), followed by North America at 24%, AsiaPacfic (exc. Japan) at 20%, Latin America at 18% and Europe at 15%.

Across sectors, Basic Materials posted an excellent combination of results with forward PE up by 17 % and net debt down by 32 %. Technology and Non-Cyclical Consumer Goods also had 20 % and 16 % increases in PE ratios respectively. On the debt side, Healthcare and Cyclical Consumer Goods dropped 41 % and 23 % falls.




So what KPMG is really saying is that, improved equity value levels since March 2009 and companies aggressively paying down debt have created good conditions for public companies to go out and buy companies this year. Forward PE ratios (which use equity analyst estimates) have also become realistic as equity analysts have concurrently brought down target prices and moved up EPS estimates.

There is one more interesting point in this analysis, which is that corporations are also competing with private equity firms for the same targets, but KPMG believes they hold a better position this year. According to KPMG"s David Simpson, "…Even though we have seen some resurgence in private equity deals, that sector of the market will continue to be hampered by a shortage of debt, putting it at a comparative disadvantage to corporates. The Predictor shows that corporate appetite and capacity are expected to increase - so we may confidently expect that corporate M&A will lead the way in 2010."




Predictions are just that, we have seen very dull M&A activity all across the globe in 2009, but the Kraft – Cadbury deal, the purchase of Burlington Northern by Berkshire Hathaway, Deloitte and PwC"s purchase of BearingPoint, Cisco"s acquisition of Starent and Tanberg, in recent months indicate that public companies are gearing up for more deal making. Private equity has been eerily silent.

There appear to be better news for M&A participants in 2010, and time will only tell if KPMG is accurate, but we cannot but surmise that things have to be better than 2009, which will go down in world financial history as likely one of the worst periods for M&A activity. ]]>01.29.201011:52 am PricewaterhouseCoopers typically releases its 13th Annual Global CEO Survey (1,200 CEO interviews in Q4-2009) in sync with World Economic Forum at Davos.

Last year, CEOs were feeling insecure and diffident about the future of the global economy and of their companies.

See what we said in our blog post last year



How things have changed. Since we saw the worst of the recession in March 2009 and the huge spring back in equity markets, it also appears to have boosted executive confidence.

The current survey is much more encouraging, top business leaders are feeling better, exuding more confidence and generally inclined towards hiring than slashing costs. This survey is in line with other confidence measurements put out by the Big Four firms, and as we have said earlier, these surveys are an excellent barometer of when the global economy will bounce back. And now it seems, that recovery is imminent.

A majority, 81% of CEOs worldwide are confident of their prospects for the next 12 months, only 18% are pessimistic. Contrast this with 2008, when 64% were confident and 35% were pessimistic.

And this brings good news for the unemployed and the underemployed.

40% of CEOs plan to hire this and 25% were planning job cuts over the coming next year. Contrast this with 50% who actually cut headcount in the past 12 months.

In Asia Pacific and Canada 50% of CEOs wish to increase employment in 2010, and do so 60% in Brazil. 20% of UK CEOs are even more bullish, they expect headcount to rise by more than 8% in 2010.

31% of CEOs are now "very confident" of their short term prospects, up from 21% last year, the lowest point in CEO confidence since PwC began its tracking.

There is a large discrepancy between developing and emerging countries. 80% of North America and Western Europe CEOs are were confident of growth in the next year, but this zooms to 91% in Latin America and in China/Hong Kong, and 97% in India. Looking at the longer term, more than 90% of CEOs expressed confidence in growth over the next 3 years.

When will this recovery happen? 60% of CEOs expect recovery in second half of 2010 or later (developed countries), while 13% quite confidently said recovery was already underway (China), and 21% bet on H1-2010 (emerging markets).

Here are some other key findings of this survey:

Fears for the future
Protracted global recession is the biggest overall concern, followed by fear of over-regulation, instability in capital markets, and exchange rate volatility.

Love-hate relationship with regulators
66% of CEOs disagreed with the notion that governments have reduced the overall regulatory burden, also opposing government ownership in the private sector even in the worst of times.

Combating the effects of recession
90% of CEOs had initiated cost-cutting measures in the past 12 months, led by those in the US, Western Europe and the UK. And get this - 80% will continue cost cutting over the next three years.

Public trust and consumer behaviour
25% CEOs believe their industry"s reputation has been tarnished by the downturn, but 50% CEOs are concerned that the recession caused a permanent shift in consumer behaviour.

Risk management
41% of CEOs plan to make major changes to their company"s approach to managing risk.

Climate change
More than 60% of CEOs are preparing for the impact of climate change initiatives.


Dennis McNally, PwC Chairman, summed up, "CEOs will be in a post-survival mode in the coming months. Their most common regret about how they dealt with the recession was not fully understanding the risks, and failing to respond more quickly. The importance of managing risk was the most often cited lesson to emerge from the financial crisis. CEOs are learning to balance risk management with decisiveness and flexibility as they seek to return to prosperity."

Mr. McNally was interviewed on Bloomberg on the results of the survey. Check out Bloomberg.com/Davos2010 videos. ]]>01.29.201011:52 am So Apple just announced the price of the iPad at $499 and that it will be available in March and April 2010.

We earlier had speculated a price of $1,000 and 20 million units, at half the price, lets assume that price-elasticity moves the numbers sold to 35 million (Note that Apple just announced it had sold 250 million iPods), the incremental sales are $17.5 billion, that's only a few billion below our previous number.

There'll be a lot of analysts with better predictions of volume, and we trust Deloitte with a known price point can do an update of their study with more accuracy, and we'll come back with our response ]]>01.29.201011:51 am Apple just today displayed to the world its much anticipated ipad tablet PC, with Steve Jobs wowing the crowd with its amazing functionalities. Finally, speculation on the name was laid to rest - the ipad is just a vowel away from the ipod! Boring as the name is, the potential for this device is simply huge.

The ipad is the big brother of ipod, it has all the cool features of the ipod on a much bigger screen, as also allows gaming, reading of books and watching of movies without the disadvantages of a smaller device.

In a press release today, Deloitte estimates that the "Goldilocks" device will be sold in the "tens of millions" this year alone. And why the Goldilocks moniker, its not too big (as a PC), its not too small (as an iPhone), yes - it's just right!!

The ipad fills a niche between smartphones (too small for watching videos or internet) and notebooks and PCs (too heavy or expensive). And here's the brilliant part, they will not cannibalise either segment, but become a utility device which adds to the growing ubiquity of computing in every household, creating a scenario where "connected, browser based devices become as ubiquitous in the living room as scatter cushions."

Apple did not quote a price on this device, but lets say for argument's sake it is $1,000. If 20 million were sold, that is $20 billion in revenues alone from this product. Note that Apple's Q4-2009 revenues were $12.5 billion, which translates into a run rate of $50 billion annually, the ipad could become a substantial portion of the company's business.

There is no doubt that Apple loyalists will jump to buy this device at their first opportunity. But the large scale success will lie in the millions of consumers in the middle who will buy the ipad in addition to and not in lieu of an iphone or a Mac.

And not only that, this device will spur simultaneous revenue streams for ipad applications and wireless WiFi companies, not to mention cool ipad games.

So there's money to be made of this in billions, and perhaps one clear way to play this game is to buy Apple stock and let that enjoy all the upside potential. ]]>01.29.201011:51 am It appears that scam artists have latched on to Big Four firms.

At this time, we see that PricewaterhouseCoopers and Deloitte are the victims of two publicly known attacks.

On their website, PricewaterhouseCoopers reports a scam where folks got bogus checks dated December 21, 2009 embossed with the PwC logo with a letter which advises "the recipients that they had been selected to be "secret shoppers." The letters guided the potential scam victims to cash the checks at specific banks, then wire the funds to another address for use by a second "secret shopper."

PwC is now working with law enforcement agencies and the Postal Service to close out this illegal effort. PwC wants anyone who has received one of the solicitations to contact Doug Smith, Postal Inspector at (813) 281-5228, or fax a check copy and instructions to 813-375-8047. The firm has put all its people on notice, in case they see or hear anything.

"Since the first batch of checks went out in December, we suspect those recipients have either reported the issue or thrown out the materials," said Rose Littlejohn head of PwC US Security. "But right now there is nothing to prevent the scammers from making another attempt"

So, beware of any checks that sound too good to be true or ask you to do something that doesn"t feel quite right, despite looking quite legitimate. Though we don"t have direct knowledge of anyone affected, its possible enough numbers have received this check to have made it to PwC"s website.




The situation is quite different with Deloitte, which has been the victim of another hoax. The Charleston, West Virginia observer reports that Robert M. "Robe" Otiso, 36, of Elk River, MN was arrested in November 2009 and charged with mail fraud, wire fraud and conspiracy to launder money. Prosecutors believe that Otiso and his alleged co-conspirators in the U.S. and in Kenya tricked state governments into diverting large payments into accounts bearing names that closely resembled those of actual vendors.

In December 2009, the paper reports that Angela Chegge-Kraszeski, a Kenyan woman living in North Carolina, admitted that she followed instructions e-mailed from Kenya to incorporate companies such as "Deloite" Consulting Corp. and "Unisyss" Corp., deliberate misspellings of real companies Deloitte Consulting LLC and Unisys Corp. She then mailed forms that instructed state governments to direct payments to the fake firms instead of the real ones, she said. Money from those accounts was later wired to Kenya.

According to the November indictment, before officials caught on, the scheme netted $919,916 from West Virginia, with an additional $1,288,037 stolen from Massachusetts, $869,546 from Kansas and $301,571 from Ohio.

Nothing of this has made it to the Deloitte website yet, as the firm is an indirect victim, along with other well known companies, of a well orchestrated effort, causing the matter to be under the purview of US law agencies. As with PwC, we hope there is a quick indictment of the true perpetrators of this scam.

Read the full article here....

Theft and misuse of logos, well-known names and top reputations is likely more prevalent now in this internet age. Folks that have received the "You are the sole recipient of $64 million" know enough to delete, but as crooks get more sophisticated, they are now getting to catch unsuspecting people in newer ways. It pays to be careful, and as the old adage goes, Caveat Emptor.

If you are aware of such checks or any new developments on the Deloitte case, do comment. ]]>01.29.201011:51 am

Deloitte was ranked first overall for client satisfaction for audit, hedge fund expertise, and regulatory and compliance by hedge funds with $1 billion or more in assets. The 2009 Alpha Awards surveyed more than 650 hedge fund firms, which collectively manage more than $1.1 trillion in assets.



When you think of financial services audit, its typically KPMG which comes to mind as the leading auditor for banks, financial institutions, mutual funds, and insurance companies. So Deloitte's ranking as the top auditor for hedge funds and its retention of the number one spot for five years calls upon traditional thinking of which firm is in top of mind while thinking of specific industries. Is KPMG losing steam not only on hedge funds, but also in other sub-sectors of the financial services industry? Also, does other rules of thumb hold, such as Ernst & Young for upcoming technology start ups?



If our readers have any thoughts on this, we look forward to your comments.
]]>01.26.201010:48 am
The World Economic Forum starts tomorrow Wednesday January 27, 2010 for four jam-packed days of the world"s most powerful and influential leaders from industry, government, academia and non-profit organizations. The sessions cover an extraordinary variety of interesting topics and bring together the planet"s best minds to discuss, debate, validate and set forth actions to improve human life and sensibility.

The organizing theme for this 40th World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in 2010 is a call to action, "Improve the State of the World: Rethink, Redesign, Rebuild", with a focus on six thematic pillars:

How to Strengthen Economic and Social Welfare
How to Mitigate Global Risks and Address Systemic Failures
How to Ensure Sustainability
How to Enhance Security
How to Create a Values Framework
How to Build Effective Institutions

Here is just a brief list of what we believe are the most interesting sessions:

27.01.2010 What Is the "New Normal" for Global Growth?
27.01.2010 The Growing Influence of Social Networks
27.01.2010 Skills Creation: The Future of Employment
27.01.2010 The Next Global Crisis
27.01.2010 Management Innovations from the Fringe
27.01.2010 Rethinking Values in the Post-Crisis World
27.01.2010 Trouble with Bubbles
27.01.2010 Who Is the New Consumer?
27.01.2010 Design for Sustainability
27.01.2010 Rethinking Population Growth
27.01.2010 The Art and Science of Imagination
27.01.2010 The Economics of Happiness
27.01.2010 Reading Leaders' Minds
27.01.2010 The Rise of Asia
27.01.2010 What Is Life?
28.01.2010 Values in Your Everyday Life
28.01.2010 Overcrowded World
28.01.2010 Rethinking Humanitarian Assistance
28.01.2010 Global Energy Outlook
28.01.2010 Next Generation Materials
28.01.2010 The Information Age and Human Behaviour I
28.01.2010 Rebuilding Long-term Economic Growth
28.01.2010 Will India Meet Global Expectations?
28.01.2010 Strengthening the Rule of Law
28.01.2010 Rebuilding Fragile States
28.01.2010 Managing the Global Commons
28.01.2010 Enrichment through Music
28.01.2010 Does an Algorithm Run Your Life?
28.01.2010 Towards Low-Carbon Prosperity
28.01.2010 Constructing the Ephemeral: Light in the Public Realm
28.01.2010 Rethinking Market Capitalism
28.01.2010 A Future by Design?
28.01.2010 Right and Wrong: What Science Tells Us
29.01.2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Getting to Zero
29.01.2010 Creating Jobs and Strengthening Social Welfare
29.01.2010 Personalized Medicine
29.01.2010 Achieving Social Goals: The Power of Behavioural Science
29.01.2010 Rethinking the Economic and Social Impact of Fitness
29.01.2010 Brazil: What Is Next?
29.01.2010 A Global Solution to Illicit Trade?
29.01.2010 From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation?
29.01.2010 Beautiful Science
29.01.2010 Prepared for a Pandemic?
29.01.2010 Saving Art through Science
29.01.2010 Does Religion's Claim to Truth Lead to Violence?
29.01.2010 Europe's Role on the Global Stage
29.01.2010 The Nature of Intelligence
29.01.2010 Entrepreneurship: The Key to Sustainable Growth
30.01.2010 Towards an East Asian Community?
30.01.2010 Discover a Hacker's Mindset
30.01.2010 Facing a Sea Change
30.01.2010 Redesigning Financial Regulation
30.01.2010 A World without Nuclear Weapons: Utopia?

The complete list is at
http://www.weforum.org/en/events/AnnualMeeting2010/IntProgramme/index.htm?date=ALL

For the inquiring mind, this is a delectable menu of topics with each vying for the other for attention. Sadly, even the delegates have to consciously choose their best set of simultaneous sessions, and of course leave enough time for very high-powered networking and interviews.

The Big Four firms are also represented at Davos 2010, and below are the key programs in which the CEOs from Deloitte, Ernst and Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers will participate. Interestingly, we had to pull this from the WEF website, and could find hardly a mention of this on the firm"s websites, contrary to prior years when a press release would proudly proclaim their participation. Are the Big Four firms keeping a low profile this year? We wonder why?

Dennis Nally, Chairman, PricewaterhouseCoopers International, PricewaterhouseCoopers, USA is on the panel on rethinking the "new normal" for key economies going forward.

James H. Quigley, Global Chief Executive Officer, Deloitte, USA moderates a panel, which asks "What values need rethinking in the wake of the "Great Recession"?

James S. Turley, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ernst & Young, USA discusses global employment by looking at human capital imbalances for a sustainable post-crisis recovery

Timothy P. Flynn, Chairman, KPMG International, USA in on the panel which inquires how business leaders can rebuild trust among their stakeholders

The participation of these firms and the choice of topics seem quite appropriate, they are engaged in serious debates on business values, employment, stakeholders and global growth.



http://www.weforum.org/en/events/AnnualMeeting2010/IntProgramme/index.htm?id=30183
What Is the "New Normal" for Global Growth?
Date: 27.01.2010
Time: 08:45-10:00
Location: Sanada 1+ 2, Congress Centre
Despite an upward revision of the International Monetary Fund's most recent World Economic Outlook, average real GDP growth of the global economy over the next five years is expected to be less than that of the five years (2003-2007) before the crisis.

In partnership with Time magazine, industry leaders, economists and policy-makers rethink the "new normal" for key economies going forward.

Simultaneous interpretation in German

This session is open to the reporting press.

Moderated by
Michael J. Elliott ** Editor, Time International, Time Magazine, USA
Panellists
Dennis Nally ** Chairman, PricewaterhouseCoopers International, PricewaterhouseCoopers, USA
Arif M. Naqvi ** Founder and Group Chief Executive Officer, Abraaj Capital, United Arab Emirates; Co-Chair of the Governors Meeting for Investors 2010
Raghuram G. Rajan ** Eric J. Gleacher Distinguished Service Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, USA
Nouriel Roubini ** Chairman, Roubini Global Economics Monitor, USA
David M. Rubenstein ** Co-Founder and Managing Director, Carlyle Group, USA
Heizo Takenaka ** Director, Global Security Research Institute, Keio University, Japan; Member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum
** confirmed for this session

http://www.weforum.org/en/events/AnnualMeeting2010/IntProgramme/index.htm?id=29950

Rethinking Values in the Post-Crisis World
Date: 27.01.2010
Time: 10:45-12:00
Location: Congress Hall, Congress Centre
Values are considered important and enduring principles, which are correct and desirable in life, shared by members of a community.

What values need rethinking in the wake of the "Great Recession"?

This session is open to the reporting press.

Moderated by
James H. Quigley ** Global Chief Executive Officer, Deloitte, USA
Panellists
Yvan Allaire ** Chair of the Board of Directors, Institute for Governance of Public and Private Organizations (IGOPP), Canada
Thomas H. Glocer ** Chief Executive Officer, Thomson Reuters, USA
Yasuchika Hasegawa ** President and Chief Executive Officer, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Japan
Hartmut Ostrowski ** Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bertelsmann, Germany
Jim Wallis ** Editor-in-Chief and Chief Executive Officer, Sojourners, USA
Muhammad Yunus ** Managing Director, Grameen Bank, Bangladesh
** confirmed for this session


http://www.weforum.org/en/events/AnnualMeeting2010/IntProgramme/index.htm?id=29937

Skills Creation: The Future of Employment
Date: 27.01.2010
Time: 09:00-10:15
Location: Aspen 1, Congress Centre
Although unemployment rates continue to rise, there are still 2.6 million jobs unfilled in the US and 4 million in Europe because of a shortage of skilled workers.

What imbalances in terms of human capital should be addressed for a sustainable post-crisis recovery?

This session will be webcast and on the record.

Moderated by
J. Frank Brown ** Dean, INSEAD, France
Panellists
Kris Gopalakrishnan ** Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Infosys Technologies, India
Jeffrey Joerres ** Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Manpower Inc., USA
Wallace King ** Chief Executive Officer, Leighton Holdings, Australia
Fred van Leeuwen ** General Secretary, Education International, Belgium
Lubna S. Olayan ** Deputy Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer, Olayan Financing Company, Saudi Arabia; Chair, Arab Business Council, World Economic Forum
James S. Turley ** Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ernst & Young, USA
** confirmed for this session

http://www.weforum.org/en/events/AnnualMeeting2010/IntProgramme/index.htm?id=29952

Rebuilding Trust in Business Leadership
Date: 28.01.2010
Time: 09:00-10:00
Location: Congress Hall, Congress Centre
A global survey in 2009 revealed that only 29% of respondents trust information communicated by CEOs, down from 36% in 2008.

What steps should business leaders take to rebuild trust among their stakeholders?

This session is open to the reporting press.

Moderated by
Richard W. Edelman ** President and Chief Executive Officer, Edelman, USA
Panellists
Eckhard Cordes ** Chairman of the Management Board and Chief Executive Officer, METRO, Germany
Timothy P. Flynn ** Chairman, KPMG International, USA
John Monks ** General Secretary, European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), Brussels
Ferit F. Sahenk ** Chairman, Dogus Group, Turkey
Ruben K. Vardanian ** Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Troika Dialog Group, Russian Federation
** confirmed for this session


]]>01.26.20109:53 am
All the Big Four firms recently made Fortune"s 2009 "100 Best Companies to Work For" list, though not at the very top as we have become very accustomed to seeing in BusinessWeek or Diversity or Working Mothers magazine. Nonetheless a very creditable performance against a tough crowd of equally impressive and quality peers. 2009 sported tougher competition as three of the five firms dropped rank from the 2008 listing.

In addition, we are seeing a varied picture with firms actively cutting positions to some minor increases at Deloitte and PwC from 2008 to 2009, in line with the general decrease in business for these firms in the Americas.

Check out our January 2009 blog post on the 2008 rankings
http://bigfouralumni.blogspot.com/2009/01/big-four-firms-honored-by-fortune.html


However, tough external conditions appear to have created some welcome bonuses for employees, either through additional holidays, a sabbatical program or less travel.

Fortune has a rigorous process to select these top companies, and with a large chunk of the selection process based on true employee responses, its hard to game this list, so makes the results reliable. It conducts the most extensive employee survey in corporate America with 347 companies in the overall pool. Two-thirds of a company's score is based on the results of survey sent to a random sample of employees from each company with questions on attitudes management's credibility, job satisfaction, and camaraderie. The other third of the scoring is based on the company's responses on pay and benefit programs, hiring, communication, and diversity.


Ernst and Young was the first to rank among the firms at #44 for 2009, moving up 7 ranks from #51 in 2008. E&Y has 24,815 US employees, down 4% from 2008, and Fortune commented that "E&Y offers a traditional pension in addition to a 401(k). The firm is courting alumni via a new magazine, Connect."

Deloitte follows Ernst and Young with #70 rank in 2009, but down 9 ranks from # 61 in 2008. Deloitte had 39,065 US employees and actually increased its staff count by 1%, as we have said earlier, Deloitte seems to be the most resilient among Big Four firms to the global slowdown. Fortune says, "Firm has invested $300 million in Deloitte University, a 107-acre campus in Texas that opens in 2011 and will be the "symbolic heart" of their organization."

PricewaterhouseCoopers is just behind Deloitte at #71 for 2009, falling 13 ranks from #58 in 2008. PwC also increased its ranks by 1% in the US and had 29,387 US employees in 2009. Fortune did pick up on this employee level increase and the minor bonus in terms of holidays, stating, "Accounting firm had minor layoffs (less than 1% of the staff), canceled 2008 year-end holiday parties, and gave two extra paid holidays to employees."

Accenture who had just made the list in 2008 with a #97 rank moved up smartly by 13 ranks to #84 for 2009. Accenture was quite tough in letting people go in the US, dropping headcount by 7% to 30,000 US employees. According to Fortune, "Management consultant adopted new Smart Work program to cut down on time employees spend at client sites; 36 offices have videoconferencing facilities."

KPMG was the final firm to make the list this year at #88 in 2009, dropping a whopping 32 ranks from a creditable #56 in 2008. KPMG also slashed employees, and as our previous performance analysis shows, had the largest drop in revenue among Big Four firms, KPMG had 20,972 US employees in 2009, down 7%. On the bright side though, Fortune reported that, "Audit firm introduced a sabbatical program allowing employees to take leaves of four to 12 weeks at 20% of pay. Some 450 employees immediately signed up for it. Employees average 25 paid days off."


]]>01.22.201012:28 pm We see from a recent press release that PricewaterhouseCoopers has received a "Strong Positive" rating in Gartner"s Global Finance Management Consulting Services MarketScope Report, which was published recently on December 21, 2009.

This is the highest possible rating in the Marketscope, a "Strong Positive" shows a provider who can be considered "a strong choice for strategic investments" where customers can continue with planned investments and potential customers can consider this vendor a strong choice for strategic investments.. The research assesses the global capabilities of nine leading finance management consulting service providers on customer experience, market understanding, market responsiveness, product/service, offering strategy, geographical capabilities and vertical-industry strategy.

Congratulations to PwC for this select honor.

Unfortunately, there is a stiff price to see the contents of this report (US$1,995), so we can"t say who the other 8 providers are, but very likely some of the Big Four firms would be on that list, and somewhat curious why PwC should feature this as a big release on their global website, but other firms are quite silent on this point.
]]>01.20.201011:55 am01.17.201010:26
About four weeks ago, on Sunday December 13th, 2009, Accenture ended its six-year sponsorship of Tiger Woods. We had blogged extensively on this topic:

On December 9th, we argued that Accenture should not continue sponsorship on moral grounds and should be the first to drop sponsorship
http://www.big4.com/read_blog/191/tiger_woods_dilemma_for_accenture__cloud_or_cancer.html

On December 12th, we were among the first to notice that Tiger was being proactively phased out of Accenture"s advertisements and home page
http://www.big4.com/read_blog/193/tiger_drops_golf__accenture_drops_ads.html

On December 13th, we agreed with Accenture"s decision to discontinue. In addition, 70% of respondents on The Big Four Poll agreed with this decision.
http://www.big4.com/read_blog/194/accenture_makes_right_decision__drops_tiger_sponsorship.html

Today, January 14, 2010, we are seeing the new version of Accenture"s ads on the home page, and according to the WSJ, these will be further blasted to the internet, 69 airports, TV, posters and print media. Recently, Accenture has been aggressively removing all traces of its association with Tiger Woods, and will equally assertively move ahead with these images to blanket media all over the world.

The Wall Street Journal reports that this was chosen after four weeks of extensive testing with focus groups and development work, and will in a subliminal sense continue the erstwhile Accenture tag line: "High Performance. Delivered." It appears that Young & Rubicam, Accenture's ad agency, provided some ideas, of which the animal ads were the top performer, besting jugglers and jump-ropers. Accenture plans to spend $40 to $50 million dollars on this advertising, after spending nearly $300 million over a six year period with Tiger Woods.

The advertisements we are seeing today on the home page are as below:

A school of fish in a shark formation – Is your business in shape to compete?
A baby elephant walks over a thin log over a chasm – You"re never too big to be nimble
A chameleon puts out tongue in a flower formation – If you innovate, they will come
A frog jumps over three frogs – Play quantum leapfrog
A baby elephant on a small surfboard – Who says you can"t be big and nimble?

Of course, prior to the scandal, before Thanksgiving 2009, Tiger did epitomize high performance on the golf course, his game was amazing, his shots were breathtaking, his confidence was powerful, and the drama in major tournaments was heightened severalfold when he played. On a technical level, Tiger Woods was the best player the game had seen for a very long time. Association with this athlete served Accenture well, he was forever aiming for greater heights and Accenture rode that up, with some memorable one-liners that demonstrated its own consulting and outsourcing capabilities.

The risks of association with one individual became very apparent as events unfolded with rapidity last November and December, revealing a less than spotless Tiger. We argued that Accenture should discontinue sponsorship on moral grounds, to show an example to its clients and its employees. With Tiger"s own press release on his indefinite withdrawal from golf, this decision became a lot easier, and Accenture was the first major sponsor to pull out on late Sunday December 13th, 2009 (our blog was first, prescient and somewhat influential we would believe!). At that time, it promised to come out with another equally engaging marketing campaign.

And so it seems that a carnivorous tiger has given way to other less ravenous animals and reptiles. The two obvious advantages of this campaign are that Accenture will no longer need to pay a real human being millions of dollars to show their faces on ads, and its unlikely that friendly animation animals will get themselves into scandals or irk the SPCA.

More importantly, we ask if this satisfies the key rule of advertising – will it sell product?

Investors certainly don"t seem to care, Accenture"s stock is close to its all-time highs (NYSE:$ACN $43.16), and the stock is even higher today that it was when the scandal broke in mid December (NYSE:$ACN $41.96). And the stock is up 0.87% today, after this announcement too.

It does not seem to affect existing clients and the backlog either, both were impacted by larger scale macroeconomic factors than any advertising campaign, as was very evident from the Q1-2010 earnings release.

So it boils down to how current clients and any new future clients will change their attitude towards Accenture based on these animal representations. Will CEOs, CFOs and CXOs of large multinationals (Accenture"s target clients) be more inclined to provide Accenture business or call them in for RFPs after seeing dancing elephants and leaping frogs. One quick place to look – if there is a dramatic increase in new consulting and outsourcing bookings for the forthcoming quarter. If that doesn"t go up, then these animals will have had no apparent impact on sales either, at least in the short term.

Business apart though, stepping back and staring at these ads, there is a strange cheesy look and a hokey feel that seems to be out of sync with a $23 billion multinational corporation. But recall what the gecko did for Geico or the dog for Met Life or what the duck is doing for Aflac – it made unknown large conglomerates into companies that the common man can relate to. Animals can have a strange way of reaching the human subconscious than any hard hitting logos, facts or golf shots. So, we are not going to bet against cute animals and smart ad men!

So over the long-term, there perhaps is some level of hidden genius here. And if played right, this could propel Accenture from a behind-the-scenes consulting firm into a popular company that everyone knows about. So while they may not help make the next sale, the underlying positive enduring impact can be potentially large.

If Accenture can insert a talking elephant or a cheeky chameleon into humorous commercials, then everyone can know about Accenture, and not just through Tiger Woods. Recall that people weren"t too thrilled about the Accenture name either, and now it rolls off everyone"s tongue, so Accenture knows a thing or two about continuous and ubiquitous advertising.

We know that if shown enough times, ads become proxy for the truth, our expectation is that in January 2011, you would be hard pressed to recall Accenture ads without these animals!

Meanwhile, as they"re staying around for a while, we"ll just get used to these animated animals and their wise tag lines.

Accenture, advertising, Tiger Woods, animals, elephants, frogs, chameleon

]]>01.14.201012:02 pm We were intrigued by a recent quote from Overstock.com's President.

On December 29, 2009,we saw, "It is nice to be back with a Big Four accounting firm," said Jonathan Johnson, President of Overstock.com. "We are pleased to have the resources and professionalism that KPMG brings as our auditors. We will work closely with them to timely file our 2009 Form 10-K. In the meantime, we remain in discussions with the SEC to answer the staff's questions on the accounting matters that lead to our filing an unreviewed Form 10-Q for Q3."

As we dug further into this, we found an interesting situation between client and auditors; and between the opinions of two different auditors, as you'll see below.

And what makes it curioser is that Overstock.com has engaged three separate auditors in a space of just nine months.

From 2001 to 2008, PricewaterhouseCoopers were the statutory auditors to Overstock.com, but this changed when the company decided to engage a replacement through a RFP process, and Grant Thornton was selected in March 2009. Subsequently, Overstock.com received a letter from the SEC in October 2009 questioning the accounting for a "fulfillment partner overpayment" (which Overstock.com recovered and recognized $785,000 as income in 2009 as it was received). Apparently earlier PricewaterhouseCoopers had determined that this amount should not be recognized in fiscal year 2008, but in 2009. However, the new auditor, Grant Thornton after further investigation on the receipt of the SEC note, determined that the amount should have been booked in 2008 and not in 2009, and that Overstock.com should restate its 2008 financials to reflect this as an asset

This put Overstock.com in a difficult spot, with a severe disagreement between two audit opinions. In the appropriate words of Patrick Byrne, the company's Chairman and CEO, "Thus, we are in a quandary: one auditing firm won't sign-off on our Q3 Form 10-Q unless we restate our 2008 Form 10-K, while our previous auditing firm believes that it is not proper to restate our 2008 Form 10-K. Unfortunately, Grant Thornton's decision-making could not have been more ill-timed as we ran into SEC filing deadlines."

In general, Overstock.com agreed with PwC's recommendation not to account for the amount in 2008 and not with Grant Thornton's opinion of booking it in 2008.

While all this was going on, Overstock.com had a make a choice on its Q3-2009 quarterly financials, which they proceeded to file without required review by an auditor (in violation of SAS 100). This unusual filing brought on a censure by NASDAQ, who then finally agreed to grant the company time till May 2010 to refile the earnings.

Meanwhile, Grant Thornton wrote separately to the SEC outlining its position, and Overstock.com responded to GT's points in a letter from the President directly to the shareholders.

Eventually, in November 2009, Overstock.com dismissed Grant Thornton as its auditor, and Grant Thornton immediately severed its relationship with the company through a letter to the SEC.

After a search, on December 29, 2009, Overstock.com finally hired KPMG to review all its financials, accounting procedures and determine the final disposition of the timing for accounting of this issue.

Other bloggers with more knowledge of the stock and history, are taking a more aggressive position on Overstock.com's actions, here's a recent post from SeekingAlpha.com:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/180743-overstock-s-latest-accounting-and-disclosure-inconsistencies?source=yahoo

All this switching around of auditors in such a short space of time does call into question the company's stance on alignment with external auditors opinions. Typically, public companies do try to stay with one acccounting firm over a long period of time and iron out any differences at a professional level. This kind of merry-go-rounding seems to suggest that Overstock.com is looking for the auditor who will agree with the company's stance rather than an independent third party who will provide an honest perspective in the best interest of investors, whose interests they do represent as their fiduciary responsibility.

And that's where it apppears to stand today, with KPMG having the unenviable task of sorting through all this confusion, settling issues with the SEC and the NASDAQ, and putting Overstock.com back in compliance and in some sense of settlement with previous auditors. GT and PwC seem to have washed their hands off this, but that's not to say, that a shareholder lawsuit may spring from the blue, as we have seen in many cases, that such messy audits have the potential for long tail litigations.

Meanwhile, on the stock market, Overstock.com ($OSTK)hit a high of $17.65 on October 20, 2009 and then has been steadily drifting downwards to $13.24 per share today. At 22.84 million shares outstanding, this is a loss of market capitalization of $110 million. Other online retailers have had generally better stock performance during this period, so clearly the accounting issue is having some level of overhang on stock performance.

In another very interesting use of philosophy from the Chairman's letter:

"All things are subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth."

- Friedrich Nietzsche

And we hope that in due course, we find the real truth, and not the interpretation that is biased towards the powerful.

Now, none of this would be apparent to the average online shopper who is seeking a real retail bargain on the "O, O, O, The Big Big O, Overstock.com", but there is always more to be had beyond the skin than is evident on the surface.

Clearly, this is not going away soon, and more news is sure to emerge as the company files its audited financials, and we'll blog as we hear of developments.
]]>01.08.201012:53 pm

An Analysis Of The 2009 Financial Performance Of The World"s Largest Accounting Firms
By Big4.com
January 2010
THE 2009 BIG FOUR FIRMS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

________________________________________

DOWNLOAD THE FULL STUDY AT
http://www.big4.com/media_kit/big4_media_kit.pdf
________________________________________



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2009 was a difficult year overall for the Big Four accounting firms: Deloitte, Ernst & Young (E&Y), KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), as their financial performance was affected by tough external conditions, slow global economic growth, cost-conscious clients and sluggish merger and acquisition activity.

After an extraordinary period of continuous revenue growth from the early 2000s to 2008, combined revenue for the four firms in fiscal 2009 did fall by 7% from fiscal 2008 in US dollar terms. Revenue decreases in US dollar percentage terms ranged from negative 5% for Deloitte to negative 7% each for Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers to negative 11% for KPMG.

The large fall in US dollar terms was also driven by the appreciating US dollar during the period. Despite this, the combined revenues of the Big Four firms was an astonishing $94 billion, with PwC retaining its leadership position as the largest accounting firm on the planet by narrowly beating Deloitte.

The Americas region represents about 40% of global revenues for the Big Four firms, but its share has been falling over the years, due to the preponderance of mature markets. Contrary perhaps to common belief, Europe, Middle East and Africa has the highest percentage of total revenues for the Big Four firms at 45%. Asia Pacific, while being the smallest region at 15% of revenues, has posted the highest growth rates, owing to the strong upswing in many emerging Asian economies.

The Audit service line accounts for almost 50% of total revenues and has been generally holding at this level across the years. Tax services experienced strong growth in 2006 to 2008, in sync with global merger and acquisition transactions activity. Advisory services has been the fastest growing service line as the firms extend their services into risk management and business consulting.

The Big Four firms cumulatively employ more than 600,000 professionals globally, with a total of 34,000 partners overseeing a steep pyramid of about 470,000 professionals.

Despite the world"s worst financial crisis for over 70 years, the Big Four firms turned in quite a creditable performance, with revenues falling only by a small percentage in local currency terms. For 2010 and beyond, we will likely see a return back to revenue growth, though it is debatable whether a string of double-digit growth over multiple years will be seen for the next few years. 2010 will also be an interesting year to watch for any changes in Big Four rankings, with a close race between Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers for the leadership position.

________________________________________



REVENUE PERFORMANCE

2009 Reverses Multi-year Revenue Growth Trend

2009 was a difficult year overall for the Big Four accounting firms: Deloitte, Ernst & Young (E&Y), KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), as their financial performance was affected by tough external conditions, slow global economic growth, cost-conscious clients and sluggish merger and acquisition activity. After an extraordinary period of continuous revenue growth from the early 2000s to 2008, mostly at a double-digit percentage rate, combined revenue for the four firms in fiscal 2009 did fall by 7% from fiscal 2008 in US dollar terms.

Quite apart from operating considerations, the large fall in US dollar terms was also driven by the appreciating US dollar during the period. The decrease in local currency terms was at a much lower level, ranging from negative 3% to positive 1%.

Despite the decrease in revenues, these large accounting firms posted some big numbers in 2009, their combined revenues was an eye-popping $94 billion, dropping from an all-time record level of over a $100 billion in 2008. Revenue decreases in US dollar percentage terms also differed across firms, ranging from negative 5% for Deloitte to negative 7% each for Ernst & Young and PricewaterhouseCoopers to negative 11% for KPMG. In local currency terms, revenue decreases were more modest, from positive 1.0% for Deloitte, 0.2% for PricewaterhouseCoopers to negative 0.2% for Ernst & Young and negative 2.6% for KPMG.

The difference across firms was driven by the intrinsic nature of the firm itself and varying compositions of service lines and geographies and a small effect due to fiscal years which spanned different calendar months. Deloitte"s fiscal 2009 ended on May 31, 2009, E&Y and PwC"s fiscal 2009 ended on June 30, 2009 and KPMG was the last to close out the fiscal year on September 30, 2009. In 2009, this small difference in fiscal year-ends would have had a relatively higher impact, for example, KPMG"s fiscal year 2009 coincided exactly with meltdown in financial markets as Lehman Brother collapsed in September 2008. Other Big Four firms had three to five fewer months of this negative impact.


Fluctuations in the US dollar also contributed to the higher level of percentage drops. The US dollar appreciated strongly from mid-2008 to mid-2009 against a basket of foreign currencies, after staying weak in the prior twelve months. This had an unfavorable effect, as depreciating local currencies, where the firms earned revenue, were converted into US dollars, in which the firms reported their annual results. In general, decreases expressed in US dollar terms were about 7% lower than decreases expressed in local currency terms.


PricewaterhouseCoopers retained its first place as the largest accounting firm on the planet with revenues of $26.2 billion, narrowly beating Deloitte, a very close second with revenues of $26.1 billion. Ernst & Young took the third spot at $21.4 billion, and KPMG maintained its position as the smallest of the Big Four firms at $20.1 billion of revenues. Deloitte proved to the most resilient firm to the tough economy, with its revenue falling only 4.9% in US dollar terms, while close rival PricewaterhouseCoopers" revenues decreased 7.1%. This enabled Deloitte to close the gap against PwC in 2008 to be at almost at par in 2009. In 2010, it will be interesting to see who will gain the leadership spot, as a relatively stronger performance by Deloitte could well edge it past PwC.


The Big Four firms have had an astonishing run up in total revenues over the last six years. In 2004, combined firm revenues were only $60 billion, but by 2008, this had moved up at a compounded annual growth rate of 14% to exceed $100 billion. Some of this gain was from the collapse of Andersen, as Andersen"s $10 billion or so of revenues in 2002 was generally redistributed over the remaining four firms. Beyond this, the global financial boom in the middle of the decade, combined with assertive penetration into emerging economies provided the engine for revenue increases.



This positive trend rapidly reversed in 2009, the first time in six years, as economies all over the world came to an abrupt halt in mid-2008, with many countries going into recessions, and ultimately affecting the seemingly unstoppable growth in Big Four firm revenues. Even with this drop in 2009, the six year compounded annual growth rate from 2004 to 2009 was 9%, a remarkable achievement, given that these multi-billion dollar enterprises had to grow their size by nearly 60% from a high starting point by either finding new revenue opportunities or penetrating current clients.

Despite being auditors for the world"s public companies who are required to report extensive details on their financials, the Big Four firms provide only very high level financial information with minimum commentary, with consequent impact on the depth of possible analysis in our study.




________________________________________

2009 FIRM PERFORMANCE

We blogged on each firm"s 2009 financial performance as they sequentially reported on The Big Four Blog, and we encourage our readers to read those analyses to obtain a flavor of the timing and our immediate response.

Ernst & Young was the first to report its 2009 financials, and with Deloitte following (on a much delayed schedule) it became clear that the year was turning out to be quite challenging on the revenue line. PwC followed suit, showing flat revenue growth on a local currency basis. KPMG was the last to report in December 2009, and its revenues fell the most among all the four firms. Additional data points from the UK member firms, where the Big Four firms have to provide more detailed information, proved that the pressure on the top line was also leading to lower bottom lines and decreased profits per partner.



In 2009, while revenues fell drastically in developed markets, all firms generally noted that emerging markets were more resilient against slowdowns, and revenues rose in many developing countries. The appreciating US dollar caused the percentage drop in US dollars to exceed the more modest drops in local currency. In general the firms" results met our expectations, though KPMG"s sharp fall was quite surprising. In addition, Ernst & Young changed their method of reporting in 2009, choosing to report combined, rather than consolidated revenues, which led to a lower level of reported revenues.



PricewaterhouseCoopers"s FY 2009 global revenues for the year ending June 30, 2009 was US$26.2 billion, a 7.1% decline from the US$28.2 billion in FY 2008 in US dollar terms. However, on local currency terms FY 2009 revenues were actually higher than FY 2008 by a modest 0.2%. This performance enabled PwC to remain the largest accounting firm on the planet.

In terms of service lines, Assurance grew 2.0% in local currency terms to $13.1 billion, but in terms of US dollars, revenues actually fell by 4.8% from $13.8 billion in 2008. PwC attributed this to market-leading strength of the business and its continued focus on improved customer service and very competitive pricing. Tax services fell by 0.3% in local currency terms to $6.9 billion, but fell 7.5% in US dollar terms from $7.5 billion in 2008. Tax was impacted by the worldwide decline in corporate deals and restructuring work. Advisory services fell by 2.9% in local currency terms to $6.1 billion, but fell 11.4% in US dollar terms from $6.9 billion in 2008. This service line was the hardest hit by the global slowdown, as M&A and IPOs dried up and private equity firms slowed, while bankruptcy and restructuring work provided some offset.


In terms of geographies, Asia revenues rose about 4% to $3.7 billion in local currency terms but falling about 5% in US dollar terms from $4.0 billion in 2008. Revenues in the smaller regions of Middle East & Africa (up 9.1%) and South & Central America (up 13.3%) also rose strongly in local currency terms, showing strong growth in emerging markets. In the developed world, revenues in both Europe and North America declined, and since these account for 85% of total PwC revenues, they essentially drove the results for the firm. Revenue growth was high in a number of PwC member firms around the world, with particularly good results in Japan, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Canada.









________________________________________


Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, the global firm, reported fiscal 2009 revenues for the year ending May 31, 2009 of US$26.1 billion, an increase in local currency terms of 1%, but a drop of 4.9% in US dollar terms from 2008.

By service line, Consulting (Advisory) was the fastest grower at 7.3% in local currency terms; and in US dollar terms, revenue increased 2% from $6.3 billion in 2008 to $6.5 billion in 2009. Audit was relatively flat against 2008 in local currency terms; in US dollar terms, Audit shrank by 6.4% from $12.7 billion to $11.9 billion. Tax was also relatively flat against 2008 in local currency terms; in US dollar terms, Tax revenues decreased by 5.5% from $6.0 billion to $5.7 billion. Financial Advisory Services revenue fell 6.1% in local currency terms, but in US dollar terms, fell by 13.8% from $2.4 billion in 2008 to $2.0 billion in 2009.


In terms of geography, Americas dropped 1.3% in local currency terms and 3.7% in US dollar terms from $12.9 billion in 2008 to $12.5 billion in 2009. Europe, Middle East and Africa rose 2% in local currency terms but dropped 9.0% in US dollar terms from $11.3 billion in 2008 to $10.2 billion in 2009. Asia Pacific grew 4.7% in US dollar terms from $3.2 billion in 2008 to $3.4 billion in 2009. The Asia Pacific region had local currency growth of 7.6% and was the fastest-growing region for the fifth consecutive year. India"s revenues grew 29.9%, Australia grew 11.5% and Japan grew 11.3% in local currency terms.

Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America and the Caribbean posted high growth rates of 21.3%, 15.6% and 13.7% respectively, in local currency.


Despite this remarkable performance, Deloitte was unable to beat PwC to be the largest Big Four firm in the world. Its 2009 revenues of $26.1 billion were behind PwC"s 2009 revenues of $26.2 billion by only $100 million or 0.4%. We had indicated in our earlier analysis that a 4.5% decrease in Deloitte"s revenues in US dollar terms would make it the largest among the Big Four firms. However, Deloitte"s overall revenues actually dropped by 4.9% from 2008 to 2009, narrowing, but not completely closing the gap against PwC. By showing remarkable performance in 2009, arguably one of the toughest environments in recent memory, Deloitte has shown that it is a strong contender for the leadership position.

________________________________________


Ernst & Young"s combined worldwide 2009 revenues for the year ending 30 June 2009 were US$21.4 billion, decreasing a modest 0.2% in local currency terms from the comparable period in FY 2008 of US$23.0 billion in global revenues. In US dollar terms, the revenue actually declined 6.8% from 2008 to 2009.

Assurance Services with FY 2009 revenues of $10.1 billion offset price pressure with market-share gains, and revenues declined only 0.7% in local currency terms, but 6.3% in US dollar terms. Global Tax Services with FY 2009 revenues of $5.8 billion was up 1.8% in local currency terms due to increased tax enforcement, but dropped 5.2% in US dollar terms. Advisory Services with FY 2009 revenues of $3.6 billion was up 1.5% in local currency terms due to sustained demand for risk management and performance improvement, but dropped 6.0% from $3.8 billion in 2008 in US dollar terms.

Transaction Advisory Services with FY 2009 revenues of $1.9 billion, had a 6.9% decrease in local currency terms due to fall in M&A volumes, but revenues decreased a large 14.8% in US dollar terms from $2.2 billion in 2008.


Across E&Y"s five geographic areas, Japan grew at 7.5% in local currency terms, due to the acquisition of 1,000 professionals from accountancy firm Misuzu; and revenues increased 20% in US dollar terms. The Europe, Middle East, India and Africa (EMEIA) area grew 1.8% in local currency terms, but declined 9.7% in US dollar terms. Oceania decreased 0.4% in local currency terms, but declined a dramatic 15.9% in US dollar terms. The Far East decreased 2.7% in local currency terms and 5.9% in US dollar terms. The Americas area decreased 3.2% in local currency terms, but 5.5% in US dollar terms.

There were some bright spots however, with many of the emerging markets achieving strong revenue growth, including the Middle East at 18.6%, India at 13.1% and Brazil at 8.0%.


Ernst & Young made a key change to their reporting of revenues in 2009, electing to show combined, not consolidated revenues by eliminating intra-firm billings. E&Y restated its 2008 revenues down from $24.5 billion as originally reported to $23.0 billion reported as restated in 2009. The reason provided for this change was, "In line with our globalization efforts to harmonize policies across member firms, revenues for 2009 and 2008 related to member firm billings to other member firms have been eliminated from the financial information presented here. This financial information represents combined not consolidated revenues, and includes expenses billed to clients."

________________________________________



KPMG reported 2009 combined revenues for the fiscal year ending 30 September 2009 of US$20.1 billion versus US$22.7 billion for the prior 2008 fiscal year. This was an 11.4% decline in US dollars terms and a 2.6% decline in local currency terms, which was the highest drop among all Big Four firms.

By service line, Audit 2009 revenues were $10.0 billion versus $10.7 billion in 2008, down 6.9% in US dollar terms but a 0.5% increase in local currency terms. In the global financial services industry, Audit services' revenues actually grew 7%.

Tax services revenues in 2009 were $4.1 billion versus $4.7 billion in 2008, a 13.4% decrease in US dollar terms and a 4.3% decrease in local currency terms. But certain practices within Tax did very well: Transfer Pricing grew 5.3%, Indirect Tax grew 8% and International Executive Services grew 7.8%, all in local currency terms.

Advisory services revenues of $6.1 billion in 2009 decreased versus $7.3 billion in 2008, by a large 16.6% in US dollars terms and 6.6% decline in local currency terms. However, Advisory in China and the Middle East posted double-digit growth.

By geography, Americas Region had 2009 revenue of US$6.3 billion versus US$7.2 billion in 2008, decreasing 12% in US dollar terms and 8.6% in local currency terms. Bright spots included Brazil with 5% revenue growth, Mexico with 8.2% growth, Venezuela grew 22.9% and Chile's revenues rose 22.7%, all in local currency terms.

In Europe, Middle East and Africa, combined KPMG member firm 2009 revenues were $10.7 billion versus $12.4 billion in 2008, dropping 13.5% in U.S. dollars terms and 0.6% in local currency terms. Middle East and South Asia was the fastest growing sub-region in Europe; and KPMG in Africa had a 9.3% growth in local currency terms.

In Asia Pacific, combined 2009 revenues of $3.1 billion decreased 1.1% in US dollars terms but grew a substantial 3.9% in local currency terms. Some countries posted spectacular results: Korea had 19.4% growth, Vietnam and Cambodia each had 17.5% growth, and Japan had 7.2% growth, all in local currency terms. KPMG said that Asia Pacific member firms are beginning to see an increasing number of M&A transactions especially in China and Korea.

Revenues in the BRIC countries as a group grew 4.3%. Middle East and South Asia was the fastest growing practice with a 25% growth rate. KPMG"s BRIC headcount increased by 11.5% this year, with BRIC headcount nearly quadrupling in the past ten years.

________________________________________

REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHY

The distribution of revenues by geography shows some very interesting insights. Contrary perhaps to common belief, Europe (including generally Europe, Middle East and Africa), rather than the Americas region (including Canada, the US and South America), has the highest percentage of total revenues for the Big Four firms, averaging 45% of total worldwide revenues. Americas average about 40% and the Asia Pacific countries (including India, South Asia, China, North Asia and Australia) have the remaining 15% of the revenue share.



The Americas



The Americas represent about 40% of global revenues, but its share has been falling over the years. From 2004 to 2009, there has been a noticeable drop of about 3% in the Americas region"s share of the total revenue for all the firms. In 2005, 43% of combined firm revenues were reported from the Americas region, whereas in 2009, it had dropped to only 40% of total firm revenues.

There also appears to be large variation across firms in the amount of revenue from this geographic region as a percentage of their global revenues. For example, Deloitte at the high end, sources 48% of its revenues from the Americas and KPMG at the low end has only 31% of its revenues from the Americas. Ernst & Young and PwC each have about 40% of their total revenues from the Americas, in line with the total firm average.


While Latin America, and particularly Brazil and Mexico have provided good growth opportunities for growth in recent years, the predominance of the mature markets of USA and Canada with slower growth has generally limited the expansion of Big Four firms in the Americas region. The 3% revenue share loss has generally gone to Asia Pacific, where emerging markets such as China, India, Korea and Vietnam have grown at disproportionately higher rates.


Europe



Europe, surprisingly, is the largest region by revenue for all Big Four firms. The Big Four firms typically combine Europe, comprising the developed countries of Western Europe, the up and coming markets of Eastern Europe with Middle Eastern and African nations for a giant EMEA region. Europe represents about 45% of global revenues, and as we see across the years, this total percentage has remained remarkably flat from 2004 to 2009. In 2004, 46% of combined firm revenues were reported from the Europe region, and in 2009, the same percentage 46% of total firm revenues came from Europe.

________________________________________

As in Americas, each firm has a different percentage of European revenues as a share of the total revenues. KPMG at the high end sources 53% of its revenues from Europe (KPMG Europe being a key contributor) while Deloitte at the low end has only 40% of its revenues from Europe, this situation being a total polar opposite of the Americas. Ernst & Young and PwC each have 45% of their total revenues from Europe, in line with the total firm average.

This diverse European region comprises both of mature markets such as the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Germany, as well as fast growing Eastern European nations - Poland, Russia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Romania. The Big Four firms have had spectacular growth in Eastern Europe as these high growth economies have matured into capitalistic markets, requiring sophisticated audit, tax and transaction services.

The Big Four firms have had tremendous growth in Russia in particular as part of their BRIC initiatives. Europe also comprises the rapidly rising countries of the Middle East – including Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Israel; as also the larger economies of the African continent – South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria for example. In the Middle East and Africa, the Big Four firms have capitalized on their historical small presence and posted very high annual growth numbers for the last few years, albeit from a smaller base.


Asia Pacific



Asia Pacific, while being the smallest region, has posted the highest growth rates of all regions. This diverse region comprises a few mature markets such as Japan and Australia, but mainly covers fast growth emerging markets such as China, India, Vietnam, Korea and Singapore. The Asia Pacific region has been in an economic boom for most of this decade, and their demand for Big Four firm professional services have multiplied. All the firms have grown at exceedingly high rates each year since 2004, with the result that combined revenues have doubled from $7 billion in 2004 to $14 billion in 2009.



Asia represents about 15% of global revenues for all the firms, and as we see across the years, this total percentage has increased steadily from 2004 to 2009. In 2004, 12% of combined firm revenues were reported from Asia, and in 2009, it had sharply increased to 15% of total firm revenues. This share gain came at the expense of the Americas region, which correspondingly lost its share of the pie.
________________________________________


BRIC



The BRIC countries – Brazil, Russia, India and China – have been unquestionably the shining stars in the growth story in recent years. Though the firms do not report individual country revenues, there is typically some commentary on the annual report on the spectacular increases in these countries.

For example, Ernst & Young reported in 2009 that revenues in India had increased 13% and in Brazil by 8%; and KPMG said that their headcount in the BRIC countries had nearly quadrupled in the past ten years.

________________________________________

REVENUE BY SERVICE LINE

The Big Four firms offer a wide variety of professional and financial services, with newer Advisory services adding to their more traditional and deep-rooted Audit (Assurance) and Tax Services. Firms vary in their structure and definition of these broad service lines, typically though about half the revenues are sourced from Audit, and the balance is shared between Tax and Advisory Services.




Audit



The audit service line, the largest in all firms, accounts for almost 50% of total revenues and generally holding this percentage level across the years. Typically Audit services is a steady business, as publicly traded clients renew auditor services each year with some increase in annual fees. Most companies prefer to maintain their auditors for a long time, providing stability to the auditors" top line. The Audit service line experienced sharp growth in total revenues in 2005 to 2007, but this has slowed down sharply in the 2008-2009 years.


From 2008 to 2009, revenue for the Audit service line for the combined firms shrank by 6% in US dollar terms, which was better than the negative 7% in Tax service line and negative 9% in Advisory, which demonstrated the somewhat anti-recessionary nature of this service line. Audit fees came under pressure in 2009, but firms maintained their focus on client service and market share gains to mitigate any losses in revenue.


________________________________________

Tax




The tax service line, forms about a quarter of the Big Four firm revenue and generally holding this percentage level across the years. Tax revenue are reasonably steady, as they derive revenue from add-on services provided to audit clients, in addition to tax services provided for transactions, complicated tax restructurings and other projects.



Tax had a very strong growth in 2006 to 2008, in line with large scale global merger and acquisition transactions activity, but had a sharp decline in 2009.
________________________________________


Advisory



The Advisory service line, forms the last quarter of the Big Four firm revenue and includes the broader non-Audit and non-Tax services such as Transaction Advisory, Risk Management, and Business Consulting services; and demarcations generally vary across the firms. Owing to this catch-all nature of this category, there are many drivers of top line results, merger and acquisition activity being a principal factor.

Advisory services have been one of the fastest growers in the Big Four firms as the firms extend their services beyond assurance and taxation through penetration into current clients or through referrals from other firms who may be conflicted out at their clients. Advisory services have generally increased their share of revenues. In 2004, they had 22% of total revenues and this had sharply increased to 28% in 2009. Despite this sharp growth, Advisory services had the sharpest decline of 9% from 2008 to 2009, as clients slowed down transaction and restructuring activities all over the world.

________________________________________

FIRM EMPLOYMENT ANALYSIS

The Big Four firms cumulatively employ more than 600,000 professionals all over the world, including partners, audit, tax and advisory professionals and administrative staff. This staggering number has been consistently on the rise since 2004, when cumulative employment was around 435,000 professionals.




Thus in six years, the number of people working at just these four firms has been around 175,000. Despite the reduction in revenues, net employment grew by more than 10,000 professionals from 2008 to 2009, with notably Deloitte and PwC adding to their workforce. The growth rate in employment of people dropped sharply to 2% in 2009.



Typical annual attrition rate at Big Four firms was running about 15% prior to 2008, so for example in 2008, the Big Four firms cumulatively would have made about 140,000 new hires to account for the loss of professionals and the additional growth. This works out to about 550 hires for each business day of the year.

Even in 2009, assuming attrition rates had dropped to 10%, new hires in 2009 would be about 70,000 equating to about 275 hires each day. Truly, Big Four firms are huge seekers of talent with correspondingly very busy recruiters even in a period of deep recession.


Elevation to partner at a Big Four firm is a tough and long process as every professional who has ever worked at one knows. Partners form an elite class within these large partnerships, and only one in about 20 people belongs to this exclusive club. In 2009, we estimate there were only about 34,000 partners in all the Big Four firms, overseeing a steep pyramid of about 470,000 professionals, thus the typical partner being responsible for about 14 professionals in 2009.

In 2004, the professional to partner ratio was only 11, thus partners are taking on more responsibilities in terms of professional management and development over the years.

Another metric that is closely watched is revenue per partner, in 2004, each partner was holding up $2.1 million in revenue, and this had crept up to $2.8 million by 2009, after peaking at $3.0 million in 2008. In other words, each partner was expected to bring in and manage client revenues of nearly $3 million in recent years to justify his or her position in the highest levels of the firms. Clearly, making partner is only the beginning of a series of demanding client development and professional responsibilities down the road.

________________________________________



ERNST & YOUNG RESTATES REVENUE



Ernst & Young changed their revenue reporting methodology in 2009, by reporting "…combined not consolidated revenues, and including expenses billed to clients in line with globalization efforts to harmonize policies across member firms". Under the prior consolidation method in 2008, Ernst & Young"s global revenues were $24.5 billion which were revised down to $23.0 billion under the new combined method of reporting. Ernst & Young restated only 2008 under this methodology but did not restate prior years, thus our analysis is affected by this reporting constraint.


________________________________________

CONCLUSION

The 2007 to 2009 recession has been the world"s worst financial crisis for over 70 years, and despite such turbulence, the Big Four firms turned in quite a creditable performance, with revenues falling by single digits in local currency terms from 2008 to 2009. Since March 2009, global financial markets have seen a marked improvement in equity values, and general business conditions are decidedly in much better shape in December 2009 than earlier in the year.

Leading economic indicators in developed nations are on the uptrend and emerging market countries have posted multiple quarters of positive GDP growth. Clearly as we stand at the beginning of 2010, there is an optimistic outlook among leading executives, and all economies are decidedly on a growth pattern in the coming year. All these are positive indicators favor Big Four firm revenue growth, as the firms participate in an increasing level of financial activities pursued by their clients, whether it be tax restructuring or compliance, transfer pricing, mergers and acquisitions, strategic growth, risk management, IFRS conversions or audit compliance.

Having likely captured the worst of 2009"s impact in fiscal year 2009, we believe that fiscal year 2010, staring mid-2009 to mid-2010, will lead to positive revenue growth due to several key factors:

 An inherent improvement in underlying client fundamentals, with greater emphasis on implementing strategies their own top line growth
 Improved equity markets which are potentially poised to do better in 2010
 A low revenue base for easy comparison
 A depreciating US dollar, which has started sliding against major currencies in mid-2009
 More efficient Big Four firms, which have undergone internal restructurings and much better positioned to take advantage of growth prospects
 Higher penetration into emerging markets with better growth profiles

We think KPMG in particular will have the strongest fiscal 2010, since its fiscal 2009 ended in September 2009, and captured much of the crisis; and further its 2010 revenues will be compared to a much lower base.

The Big Four firms dominate their space and are unlikely to face any emerging competitors for a long time, and while regulation and audit litigation do pose operating and financial risks, it is unlikely that any of these single items will be of sufficient magnitude to generally upset the status quo.

For 2010 and beyond, we will likely see a return back to revenue growth, though it is debatable whether a string of double-digit growth over multiple years will be seen for the next few years. The Big Four firms have participated extensively in the explosive growth in the emerging markets, and further it will be harder to grow at high levels from an already huge revenue baseline, now exceeding $20 billion for each firm.

2010 will also be an interesting year to watch for any changes in Big Four rankings, with a close race between Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers for the leadership position.

________________________________________


About

Big4.com is an exclusive global social network for alumni and professionals of Accenture, Andersen, BearingPoint, Capgemini, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Notes

All figures are in United States dollars

Disclaimer

Source of figures for this analysis are publicly available financial statements and / or press releases issued by Deloitte & Touche LLP, Ernst & Young LLP, KPMG LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on their website or on the internet
Big4.com believes in these numbers, but does not guarantee their accuracy
Some numbers and ratios have been estimated due to non-availability of adequate information
This study is for information only and not to be relied upon for investing purposes
Totals may be affected by rounding


Attribution

Full attribution for cover page photograph to Netream at Yahoo Flickr
All logos and trademarks are copyrights of their respective owners

You may reproduce or distribute parts or whole of this analysis, but full attribution should be given to "The 2009 Big Four Firms Performance Analysis by www.Big4.com."

2010 Copyright – All Rights Reserved

Contact

For further information, please contact Big4.com at:

Phone: (866) 690-5050
Email: Marketing@Big4.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/big4alum
Facebook: www.facebook.com/big4page

]]>01.06.20106:30 am
In November 2009, we had reported on the our news feed on Capgemini"s effort to launch a shareholding plan for its employees, with a maximum of 6,000,000 shares reserved for their employees, opening on November 17, 2009 and settlement-delivery of these shares to occur on December 16, 2009.

http://big4.com/view_letter/1145/capgemini_launches_6_mm_shares_employee_ownership_plan.html

Capgemini now reports that this very first employee shareholding plan has been a success with 14,000 employees subscribing, after reductions, to over €165 million, corresponding to 6 million newly-issued shares, having reached the maximum number of shares offered.

These shares are issued at a price of €27.58, with dividends rights. With this dilution, the number of shares which comprise Capgemini"s share capital will be 153,958,441 on December 16, 2009.

Capgemini indicates that this effort, a sign of the confidence of employees in the firm"s future, now increases the employee ownership of Group capital to around 4% (6MM/150MM). Reportedly, employees subscribed in all 19 countries where the plan was offered, with the majority of subscribers come from France, US, the Netherlands, and the UK.

Let us do some math on this, given the scant information we have available.

From an employee"s perspective, we can presume a typical employee gets, assuming that 6,000,000 shares are equally distributed to each of the 14,000 subscribing employees (6,000,000/14,000), exactly 428.57 shares. And each employee has to put out Euro 11,820 (428.57 * Euro 27.58) to buy into this offer.

What do they get in return?

First there is the capital appreciation. The current price of Capgemini is Euro 31.05 per share on December 18, 2009, which is Euro 3.47 over the subscription price, leading to a current capital gain of Euro 1,487.14 per employee (428.57 shares * Euro 3.47). There is a restriction on when these shares can be sold, as there is a lockup period of 5 years. Now, we don't know what is likely to happen in 5 years, but we can safely say that we have passed through the worst recession of a generation, and stock prices, though not at March 2009 lows, are not that far off from six-year lows. It is very likely that Capgemini, whose performance has been affected, but not devastatingly so, will likely be around as a public company in 5 years, and shares will rise from this low level. Also assume that shares go up conservatively 6% each year (for 4 years) in line with operating performance, then in 5 years, the Euro 1,487.14 will rise to Euro 1,877.48 at a compounded rate.

Second, there is the dividend. Five years worth of dividends of Euro 1 per share is Euro 2,142.86 (Euro 428.47 * 1 * 5 = Euro 2,142.86)

That brings the grand total to Euro 4,020.34, and brings the pre-tax return on initial investment to 34.01% (Euro 4,020.34 / Euro 11,820). And that attractive rate of return is unlikely to be found anywhere today in capital markets!

Which speaks to why the offer was fully subscribed. While Capgemini employees may not all be financial analysts, they certainly have the made the right choice!

From the current shareholders perspective, there is some loss of value, which gets transferred from them to employees. This amount Euro 20.82 million (Euro 3.47 * 6,000,000 shares) is only 0.44% dilution (Euro 20.82 Million / Euro 4.78 Billion company market capitalization). But the advantage current shareholders get is that they rope in employees as fellow shareholders, and thus create incentives for employees to do their best for company performance and move the share price even higher.

From Capgemini"s perspective, this plan allows them to offer monetary value for employees, align employee interests with shareholder interests, and solidifies employee involvement for the longer term.

Theoretically then, this appears a win-win all around, as generally employee shareholder plans aim to do, notwithstanding unforeseen events or unpredictable conditions down the line, which could make this a total wash.

This is our outside-in analysis. If you"re a Capgemini employee and subscribed to this offer, let us know by comments how you thought about it, and what is the general mood of other employees who subscribed. And tell us if we got our math generally right…..

Capgemini, employee shareholding, shares, market capitalization, lock-up period, shares
]]>12.20.20096:06 pm Accenture (NYSE:ACN) just reported Q1-2010 results after market close today. The full earnings release is available on the Accenture.com investor relations site. We will only provide our quick analysis here at this time.

It was a mixed quarter for Accenture, they were a little behind Street expectations on the top line but beat consensus EPS by 2 cents. Consulting revenue fell 15 percent and outsourcing revenue dipped 4 percent. Wall Street is looking for revenue strength to see how the economic recovery is progressing, having argued that companies have done all they can on the cost side to be efficient and lean. Investors first reaction was to sell owing to the miss on the revenue side and the stock turned down 3% in after hours trading but recovered to near-flat towards the end of the conference call.

Accenture guided Q2-2010 to a lower number on the revenue side than the Street, but promised excellent performance in the second half of 2010. Full year outlook sales were higher than the street, indicating $6+ billion sales in both quarters of the second half. With a relatively deteriorating dollar compared to prior year, there is a foreign exchange tailwind for Accenture in the next few months, and the company even upped its FX effect by a positive 1%. FY 2010 EPS guidance spanned the consensus EPS of Wall Street, but it was better than their previous guidance.

Conditions are tough, and since January 2009 Accenture has been affected, much like every other company by the global slowdown. The prior Q1-2009 quarter was before this impact, so understandably both revenue and EPS were lower in this quarter. Given all this, the performance of the company has been quite creditable due to its global breadth, depth and diversity of business lines. Bookings in the quarter were $5+ indicating that the pipeline is being nourished decently, but outsourcing bookings actually fell more than consulting bookings.

Accenture has $4.0 billion in cash at November 30, 2009 even after distributing $500 million in dividends and continuing its stock purchase. There is little debt and the balance sheet is rock solid.

The ACN stock is trading near 52 week highs and close to its all time highs. The quarter was not blow out but the long term story is totally intact. This is a well run machine, and produces flat EPS in the very worst of times, a performance any portfolio today would love to have. As the global economy does turn around this year, Accenture is poised to benefit by helping clients both with Consulting and Outsourcing services.

Accenture plans to add 45,000 new professionals this year, adding to its 175,000 existing staff to exceed the 200K level shortly.

We have been long time admirers of the Accenture financial machine and its performance, strong cash position, efficient and competitive management, global scale, keen ambition and focus on operations which will prove to create shareholder value well into the future.

As we have seen in previous quarters, investors seem to reflect on performance during the night and the stock actually does well the next morning. We won't be surprised if all the analysts who attended the conference call think through what was said, and produce quite favorable notes, and ACN has a pretty good morning on the NYSE tomorrow. We'll keep you posted on Twitter. Follow us www.twitter.com/big4alum




Accenture, Q1-2010, Earnings, EPS, Revenue, Consulting, Outsourcing
]]>12.17.20099:31 pm
KPMG just reported its 2009 combined revenues for the fiscal year ending 30 September 2009 of US$20.11 billion versus US$22.69 billion for the prior 2008 fiscal year. This was a 11.4% decline in U.S. dollars terms and a 2.6% decline in local currency terms.

From our previous blog posts, let"s look at the headline numbers for other Big4 firms:

"PricewaterhouseCoopers just released its FY 2009 global revenues for the year ending June 30, 2009, which came in at US$26.2 billion, a 7.1% decline from the US$28.2 billion in FY 2008 in US dollar terms. However, on local currency terms FY 2009 revenues were actually higher than FY 2008 by a modest 0.2%"

"Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, the global firm, just came out with its fiscal 2009 revenues for the year ending May 31, 2009. 2009 full year global revenue was US$26.1 billion, an actual increase in local currency terms of 1%, but a drop of 4.9% in US dollar terms from 2008."

"Ernst & Young just reported its combined worldwide results for the year ending 30 June 2009 (FY09), the first Big4 firm to report its global results. Combined global firm revenues of US$21.4 billion for the fiscal year ended 30 June 2009 (FY09) decreased a modest 0.2% in local currency terms from the comparable period in FY 2008. In FY 2008, E&Y reported US$23.0 billion in global revenues, and in US dollar terms, the revenue actually declined 6.8% from 2008 to 2009."

By service line, Audit 2009 revenues were US$9.95 billion versus US$10.69 billion in 2008, down 6.9% in U.S. dollar terms but a 0.5% increase in local currency terms. In the global financial services industry, Audit services' revenues actually grew 7%.

Advisory services revenues of US$6.07 billion in 2009 decreased versus US$7.27 billion in 2008, by a whopping 16.6% in U.S. dollars terms and 6.6% decline in local currency terms. However, Advisory in China and the Middle East posted double-digit growth.

Tax services revenues in 2009 of US$4.09 billion versus US$4.73 billion in 2008, a 13.4% decrease in US dollar terms and a 4.3% decrease in local currency terms. But certain practices within Tax did very well: Transfer Pricing grew 5.3%, Indirect Tax grew 8% and International Executive Services grew 7.8%, all in local currency terms.

By geography, Americas Region 2009 revenue of US$6.31 billion versus US$7.17 billion in 2008, decreased 12% in US dollar terms and 8.6% in local currency terms. Bright spots included Brazil with 5% growth, Mexico with 8.2% growth, Venezuela grew 22.9% and Chile's revenues rose 22.7%, all in local currency terms.

In Europe, Middle East and Africa, combined KPMG member firm 2009 revenues of US$10.73 billion versus US$12.41 billion in 2008, dropping 13.5% in U.S. dollars terms and 0.6% in local currency terms. Middle East and South Asia was the fastest growing sub-region in Europe; and KPMG in Africa had a 9.3% growth in local currency terms.

In Asia Pacific, combined 2009 revenues of US$3.07 billion decreased 1.1% in U.S. dollars terms but grew 3.9% in local currency terms. Some countries posted spectacular results: Korea had 19.4% growth, Vietnam and Cambodia each had 17.5% growth, and Japan had 7.2% growth, all in local currency terms. KPMG said that Asia Pacific member firms are beginning to see an increasing number of M&A transactions especially in China and Korea.

Revenues in the BRIC countries as a group grew 4.3%. Middle East and South Asia was the fastest growing practice with a 25% growth rate. KPMG"s BRIC headcount increased by 11.5% this year, with BRIC headcount nearly quadrupled in the past ten years.

In 2008, KPMG had 137,000 people and this number was reported in 2009 at 140,000 people, a increase of 3,000 net of hiring over attrition.

Our Analysis:

A drop in revenue was expected, the surprise was the magnitude of the drop, which was higher than other Big4 firms.

Growth in emerging markets was expected. Decrease in developed countries was also on the cards.

Tax revenue decrease (in double digits) was more than anticipated. Advisory decline was expected, with M&A activity drying up.

BRIC increase was expected also, most Big Four firms have had excellent performance in these countries.

Compared to all other firms, KPMG had the largest drop in revenues from 2008 to 2009, this could be either attributed to KPMG"s uniqueness among Big4 firms, being the smallest, as also having a year that ends that started in September 2008 and ending in September 2009, a full three months behind other Big Four firms, and encompassing perhaps the worst of the global financial crisis.

KPMG maintains its 4th place as the smallest of the Big Four firms in 2009. Its sharp drop from 2008 to 2009, indicates that it actually lost ground in 2009 versus 2008 against its next closest rival Ernst & Young on the revenue front.

What"s really interesting is that while the results are already out on PR newswire, the KPMG.com site has yet to be updated with its own firm 2009 performance!

With all the Big Four having reported 2009 results, we"ll be coming out shortly with the 2009 Big Four Firm Financial Performance Study. Stay tuned.

KPMG, 2009, revenues, growth, BRIC, China, Big Four, Audit, Tax, Advisory, growth
]]>12.17.200912:13 pm

KPMG Europe LLP, which covers the UK, German, Swiss, Spanish and Belgian practices just reported its 2009 revenues at €3.5 billion in the year ending 30 September 2009, a 0.4% drop from 2008 on a pro forma basis at constant exchange rates. Overall, KPMG said that top-line growth proved hard to come by as a result of difficult market conditions.

In the UK, revenues were €1.9 billion, down 1.6% (This translates to approximately GBP 1.7 billion). Compare this to Ernst & Young UK which grew 2009 revenues by 8% to GBP 1.4 billion (some of it due to merger), PricewaterhouseCoopers UK 2009 revenues rose 1% to GBP 2.25 billion, while Deloitte UK 2009 revenues shrank 2% to GBP 1.97 billion.
In Germany, revenues were €1.2 billion, down 1.7%
In other countries put together, revenues were €0.4 billion, up 2.7%

By service line, Audit revenues were €1.28 billion, up 3.1%; and proving to be the bright spot across services and geographies. Tax revenues were €837 million, down a whopping 5.4% due to low M&A activity but transfer pricing service demand was strong. Advisory was flat at €1.4 billion, with lower M&A offset by restructuring and debt advisory work.

KPMG also said that since 30 September 2009, member firms in the Netherlands, Luxembourg, the CIS and Turkey joined KPMG Europe ELLP, which now comprises firms in 14 countries - including the six in the CIS (Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan) - and has combined pro forma revenues of €4.5 billion with 31, 000 employees.

John Griffith-Jones and Rolf Nonnenmacher, joint chairmen of KPMG Europe LLP, said: "This was a creditable performance against the backdrop of the worst financial crisis in almost 80 years. We might have hoped for better economic conditions in our second year as a merged firm but rather than put our expansion plans on hold we have continued to pursue a whole range of strategic initiatives that will shape our performance over future years.

Looking ahead, Rolf Nonnenmacher and John Griffith-Jones said 2010 would be another challenging year, though there were encouraging signs of economic recovery.

As expected, and in line with other Big4 firms, European revenues in 2009 came in lower than 2008 by a modest percentage. UK revenues for KPMG were below E&Y and PricewaterhouseCoopers but just a shade better than Deloitte UK. KPMG Europe also includes only the developed nations of Europe this year. Next year, with the addition of other firms, notably Turkey and CIS, the combined firm not only enjoys a higher level of revenue but also likely a higher level of overall growth as the Big Four firms have been showing higher increases in revenues in less developed nations. Also, the impact of foreign exchange rates on KPMG Europe is muted, as most of transactions are done either in Euros or British Pounds.

This was expected and inline level of performance with no unusual surprises, and flat revenue is creditable given the very tough conditions all over Europe in 2009. KPMG is also the last firm to report in the year, and by being delayed till end of September 2009 (versus mid year 2009 for other Big 4 firms), we can see that the economic impact on Big4 firms still continues. 2010 looks to be equally tough, though some good news is rising on the horizon for the global economy.

We are still awaiting KPMG International 2009 results for year ending 30 September 2009 which could be released any time now, and bring to close all the reporting for Big4 firms in 2009.

KPMG, KPMG Europe LLP, UK, Germany, results, revenues, Audit, Tax, Advisory
]]>12.15.200912:34 pm If you want to find a great job upon graduating from college, then starting early appears to be the secret.

Business Week and Bloomberg just released their third annual listing of top undergraduate internship programs in the country based on pay and the percentage of interns who get full-time jobs, and feedback from career services directors.

And the Big Four firms completely dominate this ranking, taking the top four of the five top spots, beating out such well-known companies as Goldman Sachs, General Electric, Microsoft, Boeing, Cisco, and Johnson & Johnson.

The number one spot goes to Deloitte which also placed number 1 in the recent best places to launch your career rankings. Interns pocket a cool $10,000 for the summer, and very likely to go back to Deloitte with a confirmed offer. It must be a worthwhile experience, since 7 of 10 entry level hires were previous interns. However, there are relatively a lot of spots available which seemed to have held steady despite these tough times for hiring,

2009 Rank - 1
2008 Rank - 4
Employer - Deloitte
Interns hired in 2008 – 2,200
Interns hired in 2009 – 2,233
Intern hiring planned for 2010 – N/A
2009 Average hourly wage ($) - $24.50
2009 Average total pay for interns ($) - $10,000
2009 Interns who received full-time job offers (%) - 73
2009 Interns with offers who accepted (%) - 80
2009 Entry-level hires who were former interns (%) - 70
2009 Best Places to Launch a Career Rank - 1

KPMG bags the second spot on this ranking, shooting up 3 places from 2008, it placed number 4 in the recent best places to launch your career rankings. Interns seem to get more pay than even number 1 Deloitte by taking home $10,900 for their efforts. The likelihood of going back to KPMG after the internship is extraordinarily high, 9 of 10 interns get a confirmed offer, and 9 of 10 appear to accept. Also a huge 91% of entry level hires were previous interns. The number of internships seem to be shrinking at KPMG, with 500 less spots next year than in 2008.

2009 Rank - 2
2008 Rank - 5
Employer - KPMG
Interns hired in 2008 – 2,200
Interns hired in 2009 – 1,745
Intern hiring planned for 2010 – 1,700
2009 Average hourly wage ($) - $24.80
2009 Average total pay for interns ($) - $10,900
2009 Interns who received full-time job offers (%) - 90
2009 Interns with offers who accepted (%) - 93
2009 Entry-level hires who were former interns (%) - 91
2009 Best Places to Launch a Career Rank - 4


The third place winner in Ernst & Young, staying flat from its spot in 2008, it was just behind Deloitte in the recent best places to launch your career rankings. Interns make the least dough among Big Four firms for their diligence. The likelihood of going back to the firm is also as high as KPMG, 9 of 10 interns get a confirmed offer, and 9 of 10 appear to accept. But it is interesting to see that 4 of 10 new hires do not actually intern with E&Y, which tells you that if you miss the cut this year, there"s still a good chance of a full time offer. Ernst & Young is actively reducing the number of internships, with 800 less spots next year than in 2008.

2009 Rank - 3
2008 Rank - 3
Employer – Ernst & Young
Interns hired in 2008 – 2,507
Interns hired in 2009 – 1,971
Intern hiring planned for 2010 – 1,800
2009 Average hourly wage ($) - $22.00
2009 Average total pay for interns ($) - $9,585
2009 Interns who received full-time job offers (%) - 92
2009 Interns with offers who accepted (%) - 92
2009 Entry-level hires who were former interns (%) - 60
2009 Best Places to Launch a Career Rank - 2

PricewaterhouseCoopers, the largest Big4 firm on the planet gets fifth place, behind Proctor and Gamble, and falling 3 spots from #2 spot in 2008. PwC was behind Deloitte and E&Y in the recent best places to launch your career rankings. Interns make just a smidgeon less than Deloitte, but have a good shot at going back to the firm, 9 of 10 interns get a confirmed offer, and 9 of 10 appear to accept. As with E&Y 3 of 10 new hires do not actually intern with PwC, so if the intern bus leaves this year, there"s still a good chance of a full time offer. PwC is holding nearly flat its number of open spots.

2009 Rank - 5
2008 Rank - 2
Employer – PricewaterhouseCoopers
Interns hired in 2008 – 2,320
Interns hired in 2009 – 2,278
Intern hiring planned for 2010 – 2,175
2009 Average hourly wage ($) - $23.75
2009 Average total pay for interns ($) - $9,878
2009 Interns who received full-time job offers (%) - 89
2009 Interns with offers who accepted (%) - 93
2009 Entry-level hires who were former interns (%) - 69
2009 Best Places to Launch a Career Rank - 3

Accenture has moved up smartly to number 9 from a #47 spot in 2008. Accenture was 11th place in the recent best places to launch your career rankings. Interns get the lowest rate on a per hour basis, but seem to make it in hours to make almost the same as another Big4 firm. 2 of 10 new hires do not actually intern with Accenture, so looks like the internship program is not the only route to a job at Accenture.

2009 Rank - 9
2008 Rank - 47
Employer – Accenture
Interns hired in 2008 – 198
Interns hired in 2009 – 122
Intern hiring planned for 2010 – 150
2009 Average hourly wage ($) - $21.00
2009 Average total pay for interns ($) - $9,975
2009 Interns who received full-time job offers (%) - 95
2009 Interns with offers who accepted (%) - 85
2009 Entry-level hires who were former interns (%) - 22
2009 Best Places to Launch a Career Rank – 11

There are two clear take-aways from this ranking. First, Big4 firms are a great place to have an internship, and the chosen ones seem to like it well enough to begin their careers there. Second, career planning just got moved a year ahead if we take these high percentages to be true – if you didn"t make the internship list, it's a tough road to get an entry level job. But let that not dissuade candidates who want to work at a Big Four firm, as many alumni can agree, hiring of experienced level candidates happens all the times and at different points in a career, there"s a lot of depth, breadth and requirements for external professionals in all Big Four firms.

But if you"re a junior at a college though and reading our blog, you"re better off getting serious at those internship campus interviews right away.

Big 4, Business Week, Bloomberg, internship, rankings, career, undergraduate
]]>12.14.20092:39 pm
Just now, on the Accenture.com website Newsroom, we find the following news update:

"Accenture Sponsorship Update

Related Assets December 13, 2009NEW YORK; Dec. 13, 2009 – Accenture (NYSE: ACN) today announced that it will not continue its sponsorship agreement with Tiger Woods.

For the past six years, Accenture and Tiger Woods have had a very successful sponsorship arrangement and his achievements on the golf course have been a powerful metaphor for business success in Accenture"s advertising. However, given the circumstances of the last two weeks, after careful consideration and analysis, the company has determined that he is no longer the right representative for its advertising. Accenture said that it wishes only the best for Tiger Woods and his family.

Accenture will continue to leverage its "High Performance Business" strategy and "High Performance Delivered" positioning in the marketplace. The company will immediately transition to a new advertising campaign, with a major effort scheduled to launch later in 2010."

We applaud this decision. Accenture has made the right choice.

As we have said earlier, Tiger"s private persona has got entangled so much with his public personality, that there was collateral damage to his sponsors. We argued that continuation of sponsorship is tantamount to condoning immoral behaviors of Accenture"s advertising front man, and sends the wrong signal to its clients and employees.

Accenture has finally taken the correct moral decision, and we stand vindicated in our point of view, which we forcefully expressed before the scandal grew to such enormous positions.

This has just come out on the Accenture website, and clearly there will be speculation on Accenture"s next steps. Serendipitously, 2010 is just round the corner and Accenture can start off on the right foot for its marketing campaigns. On its own, Accenture is a strong global brand, has excellent operating management and enviable financial performance. It will continue to create shareholder value in good measure in the future on its own steam.

Tiger was helpful to the brand when it was appropriate, not simply convenient. We may say that the circumstances have changed to make the association inappropriate, but not inconvenient. Disengagement may be troublesome in the near term, but prove to be substantially right over the long term.

This courageous decision, as we had anticipated, came earlier than other sponsors, and had done the firm, its employees and its alumni proud.

We"ll have more on Monday when the dust settles and more reaction is available.

Note that this is likely to come up on December 17, 2009 conference call, when Accenture reports is Q1-2010 results.

Accenture, Tiger, sponsorship, Tiger Woods, golf, advertising, update
]]>12.13.200910:07 pm
Yesterday, Tiger Woods made a public statement that he was taking an indefinite break from professional golf on his home page. Much has been made of the exact words used in this statement. Regardless this was the perhaps the right (and very tough) decision to make under these trying circumstances.

Tiger, who was in the middle of the storm, blinked first.

And that perhaps makes it an easier decision for his sponsors.

We can understand the feelings involved in Tiger"s staying away from his key passion. Golf made Tiger, and Tiger was golf, and he has been the greatest ever player of the game till now. That is undeniable, his game was a joy to watch, and his victories were treasured moments for all golf fans. On the golf course, he was a consummate player and a fierce competitor, and his "championship face" showed his intense concentration and desire to win. Golf viewership and victory purses soared whenever he was in contention. Tiger was compelling and his game and strategy were delightful. This we grant and cannot take away at all.

Tiger may return to golf one day, claim his few majors and yet become the greatest player ever of the game. But his indefinite is as vague as the Federal Reserve Board"s intention to keep interest rates at zero percent for an indefinite period. Someday, things will change from status quo and the public will forget all about it all, with some other bizarre occurrence occupying its fickle mind.

Unfortunately, his personal behavior has been out of sync with being a master of a tony and elite sport. And that has been the cause of his present downfall. We want our heroes to be pure and ethical and beyond mere mortal corruptions.

And our issue here is not with Tiger the individual, rather with his sponsorship relationships. And in particular with that of a Big4 firm, Accenture.

His sponsors, in a very tight spot yesterday, are probably breathing a sigh of relief. A tough decision on their part became much easier today.

AT&T and Gillette have already made announcements and likely to step away soon.

In case of Gillette, Tiger will be phased out from TV and print ads, public appearances and other efforts linking the two entities together. Damon Jones, Gillette spokesman, said,
"This is supporting his desire to step out of the public eye and we're going to support him by helping him to take a lower profile."

In case of AT&T, spokeswoman Susan Bean said, "We support Tiger's decision and our thoughts will be with him and his family. We are presently evaluating our ongoing relationship with him."

Accenture, the other key sponsor, has not made a public statement as yet, but has been proactively fading Tiger away as their advertising front. Three days ago, Tiger Woods prominently featured as the only graphic on their global home page www.accenture.com. Two days ago, there were two other graphics which shared the page along with Tiger. And yesterday, the Tiger graphic was gone.

Also, other references to Tiger in their advertising campaigns were being aggressively removed with many relevant pages showing up as errors. Accenture ads also changed, with Tiger"s photograph being taken away overnight. Much has been said on social media about Accenture"s tag lines on Tiger advertisements, and what seems very normal under former circumstances, now have an undeniable second meaning, all too inappropriate.

In our earlier post, we said:

"We think however, that Accenture should stop sponsoring Tiger Woods right away. This, in our opinion, is the right moral decision. Accenture is a well-regarded, respected squeaky-clean brand signifying class, ethics and high standards. It is a tough decision to disassociate from an advertising front man, but that front man has not kept his end of the bargain, and has caused injury to his wife and family.

Continuation will send a wrong message to Accenture"s employees and clients that such behavior is not reprehensible since it can be justified to be monetarily beneficial. Accenture may not be unduly hurt financially by this step, and its own future actions rather than its association with Tiger will prove its corporate success.

We would think Accenture alumni will think similarly and will be proud that Accenture chose the right moral decision rather than the right business decision. In this case, we believe Accenture should blink first, regardless of the consequences."

We sense that Accenture is quickly stepping away from Tiger Woods, but has not made a public statement as yet about sponsorship. And this has accelerated each day as more unsightly Tiger news hits the wires. Bloomberg claims Acenture spokesman Alex Pachetti didn"t return calls seeking comment.

And we still maintain that Accenture should make a public statement to discontinue its association and sponsorship. Continuation is certainly not the right course of action, and our non-scientific poll of visitors on www.Big.com indicates that 67% agree that Accenture should stop.

We understand that the sponsorship is worth $10-$15 million on an annual basis. This money is best allocated to other activities to promote the Accenture brand.

The coming week will have more concrete developments, and we hope that what we are looking for will show up in the next few days.

Accenture, Tiger Woods, sponsorship, Gillette, advertising, brand, golf, indefinite
]]>12.12.20095:30 pm
In consonance with a smart pickup in global equity markets from a trough in March 2009 to near January 2009 values towards the end of this year, Initial Public Offerings have also gathered a lot of steam.

Ernst & Young"s year-end 2009 Global IPO update shows that the dollar value of deals in the first 11 months of 2009 till November 2009 of $95 billion is at the same level as the first 11 months of 2008, though there were only 495 deals in 2009 versus 740 deals in 2008. For the full year 2009, E&Y expects the deal value to exceed $100 billion.

While 2008 was not a great year compared to the go-go 2007, this update clearly points to stability and a potential bottoming out of the IPO marketplace. And that, in a year full of glum news, is some cause for celebration.

After a dull first half 2009, IPO activity picked up in the second half, mainly due to deals from Asia and South America, which raised $69 billion in listings year to date 2009, about 72% of the total IPO value. Emerging markets provided the boost to capital raisers, and developed world capital markets took a real backseat in this regard. Of the top 10 IPOs, six were from emerging markets.

China and Brazil have been the key drivers of global IPO activity.

Large scale stimulus and focus on domestic consumption in China, have created near 9% growth each quarter in China this year, and Chinese stockmarkets were the first to move up in 2009. Chinese companies, with ample growth opportunities were tapping both the Hong Kong and Shanghai stock markets to gather capital from investors. China State Construction Engineering Corp, which listed in Shanghai in July 2009 at $7.3billion, and Metallurgical Corp of China Ltd ($5.2 billion on the Shanghai and Hong Kong stock exchanges) were the top IPOs for 2009.

Brazil"s economy and stock market have been the fastest growing this year, and low inflation, higher commodity prices and general optimism pushing Brazil to be a top flyer in capital markets. Banco Santander Brazil SA was the largest IPO in 2009 and the largest in Brazilian history, raising $7.5 billion.

In North America, IPO value actually declined 38%, from $27 billion in the first 11 months in 2008 to US$17 billion with 66 IPOs listed in 2009

In Europe, IPO value actually declined 66%, from $14 billion in the first 11 months in 2008 to US$5 billion with 50 IPOs listed in 2009

In Middle East IPO value actually declined 85%, from $13 billion in the first 11 months in 2008 to US$2 billion with 16 IPOs listed in 2009

By sector, industrials (77 IPOs); materials (68) and high technology (55) led by numbers of IPO. Financials, industrials and real estate accounted for 50% of total capital raised.

No surprise then that the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange jointly accounted for 36% of all IPO capital raised on the entire planet in 2009.

Gregory K. Ericksen, Global Vice Chair Strategic Growth Markets for Ernst & Young had this to say about growing power and confidence in emerging markets, "The principal exchanges in China, India, Brazil and other emerging markets are now mature enough to source funding for the very largest companies seeking listings."

Bankers in New York and London had better be worried. Big deals are being done in the East and in the South, and there appears to be enough talent and demand in those markets, that they may continue to stay there. The BRIC countries, as we have seen in almost every survey and study, will be the head horsemen as the global chariot finally leaves behind this awful recession for better roads ahead.

Ernst & Young, global, IPO, China, Brazil, BRIC, capital, deals, offerings, Santander
]]>12.10.20092:40 pm
Using celebrities as company advertising fronts has both immense rewards and equally high risk. On the positive side, associating with a well-known, successful and popular personality provides instant brand recognition, enhances the company by association and quite often works off the image already created and crafted by that celebrity. The risk however is that any negative impact to that celebrity creates collateral damage for the company, and a long-term association is difficult to quickly unwind.

With his recent accident in Florida and the ensuing public brouhaha, Tiger Woods has been dominating the internet and tabloids with some less than salubrious news. His image as a clean, conscientious family man has taken a huge beating, and his purported dalliances outside his marriage have completely tarnished his public persona.

This has already lead to collateral damages for his numerous commercial sponsors, including Accenture, Pepsi-Gatorade, Nike, NetJets, Gillette, Golf Digest and Electronic Arts. Most sponsors have stated that they will stick with and stick by Tiger through these trying times. As of today, only Gatorade has dropped Tiger by discontinuing its Gatorade Tiger Focus line of energy drinks, and Gatorade claims that this decision was made months before this recent incident.

Tiger reportedly makes $100 million dollars each year from these sponsorships; and has made over $1 billion over his career-to-date, the highest ever by a single athlete.

We think Tiger Woods poses a dilemma for Accenture.

Accenture has been closely associated with Tiger Woods for several years now, the company advertisements (both on print, TV and the internet) prominently feature Tiger, often facing difficult conditions, but with brimming confidence that he will find a way out, as he has done so many times in real life in golf tournaments. Accenture"s "Go On, Be A Tiger" tag line has been a hit, with its pithy admonition for companies to make calculated investments (with Accenture"s help, of course) and come out winning. There are many other memorable lines, including "Opportunity isn"t always obvious", and "It"s what you do next which matters", which have served Accenture well as Tiger has gone on to the highest possible levels in professional golf with amazing talent.

In addition, Tiger is the front man at Accenture Match Play Championships, which he has won several times, and he did launch his 2009 season after returning from reconstructive knee surgery. The association between Accenture and Tiger is quite strong (and likely quite lucrative) for Tiger, but the reverse association is actually more so for Accenture. Note that on its own, Accenture is a strong global brand and very well known in its industry and to corporate clients all over the world.

So Accenture has a lot riding on Tiger maintaining his image. The unintended consequences for the company can be quite high. The swirl of bad news and with more revelations showing up each day is likely causing some concern at Accenture HQ.

That is not to say that it will be devastating, in fact, investors, the ultimate owners of the company don't particularly seem to mind. A Motley Fool survey of investors got Accenture a respectable and solid 4 star as a stock investment, and Goldman Sachs recently upgraded Accenture to buy with a price target of $50.

The key question is whether this is a Cancer or a Cloud.

Is Tiger"s public image permanently damaged, with no chance of recovery? Or is it a passing scandal, which after living out its short life will pass away and out of the public"s very short term memory. Note that in previous scandals with well known athletes (think Michael Jordan, Mike Tyson, Kobe Bryant etc.) though dominated the news at the time did all eventually melt away as the public moved on to the next cheesy news. And these athletes did go on to win public favor and do even bigger things in their careers.

If a Cancer, then Accenture is better off pulling its sponsorship right away. And if a Cloud, its probably better to stay and wait it out till things subside.

Of course, the same decision has to be likely made by each sponsor, and this opens up a fascinating game theory problem. If all sponsors drop at the same time, and it is really a Cloud, regardless it is deemed a Cancer; and Tiger and all sponsors lose. If sponsors continue, they are sending a message that it is a Cloud; and the scandal is a mere distraction.

The problem happens when they don"t act as a pack.

If one sponsor decides it's a Cancer, and other sponsors decide it"s a Cloud, then the former sponsor loses the game as the athlete comes back swinging. Conversely, if one sponsor decides it's a Cloud, and other sponsors decide it"s a Cancer, then the former sponsor has a big public image loss.

The key question is who blinks first?

Of course, with the passage of time, does the decision become easier; and the optionality value dies a little.

Accenture looks to be playing it safe. It"s gently pulled out all its ads with Tiger Woods on the internet, and it appears that all prime time TV ads have been stopped. The www.accenture.com home page, which on December 7th, 2009 had a large graphic of Tiger Woods, has been now replaced with two additional graphics on December 8th, 2009, so that the Tiger Woods graphic now only shows once every three times the home page is retrieved.

Accenture has not yet made a public statement that it is either staying with or trenching Tiger. It is keeping its options open and doesn"t want to the first to blink.

We think however, that Accenture should stop sponsoring Tiger Woods right away. This, in our opinion, is the right moral decision. Accenture is a well-regarded, respected squeaky-clean brand signifying class, ethics and high standards. It is a tough decision to disassociate from an advertising front man, but that front man has not kept his end of the bargain, and has caused injury to his wife and family.

Continuation will send a wrong message to Accenture"s employees and clients that such behavior is not reprehensible since it can be justified to be monetarily beneficial. Accenture may not be unduly hurt financially by this step, and its own future actions rather than its association with Tiger will prove its corporate success.

We would think Accenture alumni will think similarly and will be proud that Accenture chose the right moral decision rather than the right business decision. In this case, we believe Accenture should blink first, regardless of the consequences.

There will be certainly daily, if not hourly developments on this front, and we will continue to blog on this topic. Accenture"s final actions and subsequent events will make for a fascinating case study. If any readers have any insights on this, we welcome your comments.

Accenture, Tiger Woods, Elin Nordegren, Match Play, sponsorship, Tiger, Florida
]]>12.09.20094:46 pm
KPMG recently released its Global Business Outlook Survey on global manufacturing and services. And it has good news for the world economy and some unexpected surprises.
Overall, the survey indicates that, with manufacturing and service sectors getting more confident, there are robust growth prospects for the world economy over the next 12 months.

In October, there appears to be renewed optimism for 2010, with sentiment being highest in the US and the BRIC area, although EU and Japanese companies also anticipate solid gains in output. We already know about rosy prospects for BRIC, but US"s leadership position is unexpected and a pleasant surprise. Brazil is set to post a particularly marked expansion, whereas India is expected to underperform its BRIC peers. Overall, revenues and profits are expected to increase at solid rates.

Services are expected to lead manufacturing by a slight amount in this recovery, as typically service industries are much faster to react to demand upturns that longer lead time manufacturing industries. Correspondingly, hiring intentions are strongest in the service sector, although manufacturers also anticipate a rise in staffing levels.

The most upbeat expectations for activity in the service sector are by Post & Teleco companies, followed by Renting & Business Activities firms. In manufacturing, confidence is highest in the Chemicals & Plastics and Timber & Paper sectors. Further, within services, labor-related costs are predicted to be a higher contributing factor to inflation than outsourcing and all other non-staff costs.

Inflation is expected to show up in 2010, as both input costs and output prices are expected to increase, although at a benign rate, with inflationary expectations being highest in the BRIC region. Japanese companies, as in previous years, are anticipating continued deflation.

On the jobs front, the one-year outlook comes out looking broadly positive. Jobs are expected to be added in both services and manufacturing sectors, with services leading the way. Among all nations, the BRIC countries and the US are expected to lead the expansion. European service providers anticipate only a modest rise in staffing levels, mainly Italy, the UK and France, while Japanese companies are looking to a marginal reduction.

We have said earlier that Big Four firm surveys are a good barometer of executive mood and actual business performance and act as a leading indicator of when the world economies will emerge from their slump. Over the last six months, we have noticed that surveys from PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte and Grant Thornton have all been signaling that the worst is over, and optimism is generally back. This corroborates other business and consumer confidence indices all over the world, as well as a good upswing in stock and asset prices since March 2009. This comprehensive survey from KPMG only validates the recovery story better. The survey has a lot of coverage on results by individual country and sector and recommended reading for those planning, budgeting, investing, hiring or otherwise interested in the global prospects for 2010.

The complete 69 page survey is at http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Pages/Business-Outlook-survey-November-2009.aspx

The survey uses net balances to indicate the degree of future optimism or pessimism for each variables, which can vary between -100 and 100. A value of 0.0 signals a neutral outlook for the coming 12 months. Values above 0.0 indicate optimism amongst companies while values below 0.0 indicate pessimism. The net balance figure is calculated by deducting the percentage number of survey respondents expecting a deterioration/decrease in a variable over the next twelve months from the percentage number of survey respondents expecting an improvement/increase. The current report is based on responses from around 6,200 service and manufacturing firms worldwide.


KPMG, Business Outlook Survey, US, BRIC, business activity, global, employment
]]>12.03.20092:59 pm
Just in the last few days, Dubai World (DW) shocked investors all across the world in announcing that it will take steps to seek a six month standstill period on payments of interest and principal on $59 billion of its outstanding debt. This terse and surprising announcement on late Thursday November 25, 2009, the eve of a national holiday in Dubai, spooked stockmarkets all over the globe, with Asian and European markets reacting immediately on open with a 3% drop, before recovering somewhat over the day on Friday.

Middle Eastern and South Asian markets, countries with most exposure to Dubai business, dropped precipitously if not in percentage terms, then certainly in confidence in the city-state"s future. On Thursday, the first full trading day in Europe since Dubai"s announcement, the FTSE 100 index in London lost 3% to close down 171 points, the DAX index in Germany fell 3.25% and the CAC-40 index in France lost 3.41%. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 stock average, was less affected, falling about 0.62%.

Dubai World (DW) is Dubai"s (one of the seven United Arab Emirates) state investment fund which makes portfolio and real estate investments both in the country and abroad, including the QE2 cruise liner, the Emirates airline and the Travelodge budget hotel. DW"s debt of $59 billion is 75% of the total $80 billion debt of the country. DW has principal real estate investments through its arm Nakheel with its glamorous resorts on man-made beaches at the Palm, exotic seven star hotels and the tallest building in the world.

Property prices in Dubai have slumped and buyers are nowhere in sight, thus sharply reducing incoming funds, while debt burden continues. DW borrowed heavily from commercial banks, especially in the UK to fund its various investments, and at that time, with the go-go attitude in the sheikdom, and with the implicit backing of a supportive government, banks were happy to part with their money. What seemed quite normal at that time is likely causing a lot of heartache now.

Dubai World has hired Deloitte and Rothschild to assist in its efforts to gain a standstill period from its debtors DW had a $3.5 billion bond payment due in December and wants some breathing space on all debt repayments which are due until the end of May 2010.

Aidan Birkett, the head of Deloitte UK"s 1,200 strong London Corporate Finance practice flew immediately on Wednesday with a large support contingent to Dubai. Aidan Birkett has handled such cases earlier and is no stranger to big-ticket debt restructurings. See his profile at

http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/services/corporate-finance/article/96909311586fb110VgnVCM100000ba42f00aRCRD.htm
http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/services/corporate-finance/press-release/e2e99c9096ffd110VgnVCM100000ba42f00aRCRD.htm

A Deloitte spokesman said: 'We can confirm that Aidan Birkett, managing director for corporate finance at Deloitte, has been appointed chief restructuring officer to Dubai World.'

Interestingly Aidan Birkett left PricewaterhouseCoopers UK in October 2000 along with three other senior partners Andrew Grimstone, Jerry Loftus and Stephen Knight to join Deloitte UK.

There seems to be some talk now that Abu Dhabi, Dubai"s oil-rich sister emirate would bail out DW to protect the credit rating and stature of the entire UAE, but again there is no definitive agreement that this would happen right away. Abu Dhabi has reportedly said that it would not do a blank-check bailout but deal with the issue on a case by case basis.

On the other side of the fence, big UK banks, namely HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, Lloyds Banking Group and Standard Chartered reportedly hold $30 billion or 50% of this debt and consequently quite invested to defend their interests and get the best deal possible on reclaiming their money back from the beleaguered DW. Data from the Emirates Banks Association shows that HSBC has exposure of $17bn, Barclays of $3.6bn and RBS has about $2.2bn.

They have hired KPMG to assist them in this endeavor, though there are reports that PwC is also in the running. KPMG will be formally appointed once the creditor banks have created a steering committee comprising five or six of the main lenders to lead the negotiations, it added. No one apparently at KPMG was immediately available to comment.

So, its Big4 firm versus Big4 firm in a battle that is certainly the first business news today all across the world. One issue that we would point out is that KPMG is the statutory auditor for one of DW"s portfolio subsidiary companies - Dubai Ports World (DP World), and this would create certainly, a direct if not indirect conflict, for KPMG, though at this point it is not clear how this conflict is going to be resolved. http://www.dpworld.com/ar/2008/inc/2008_DP_World_Annual_Report.pdf

In an editorial in the UK"s The Telegraph, influential bond investor, Mohamed A El-Erian, CEO and co-CIO of PIMCO said it in clear terms of why this is such a key development for the world, "Let Dubai be a reminder to all: last year's financial crisis was a consequential phenomenon whose lagged impact is yet to play out fully in the economic, financial, institutional and political arenas."

See his entire editorial at
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/6678194/Dubai-what-the-immediate-future-holds.html

What drove the choice of Deloitte and KPMG is also not very clear at this time, why E&Y and PwC are out of the picture either by choice or by refusal is also not fully known. We will certainly learn more as this saga unfolds over the next few weeks, and we will keep you updated on latest developments as with the key role played by the Big Four firms in this riveting story.

Of course, if our readers have more news, ideas, insights or comments, we welcome their input.

Dubai World, $59 billion, debt, standstill, KPMG, Deloitte, Dubai, Abu Dhabi
]]>11.29.200910:00 am11.27.20096:34
Entrepreneurs are hardy folks. Undeterred by current circumstances, they are entirely focused on their vision and a rosier tomorrow.

And in this deep and difficult recession, Ernst & Young found that entrepreneur-driven companies are still looking for growth and opportunity in these tough times by adapting their operating methods to set themselves up for market leadership when the economy does turn to the upside.

Ernst & Young surveyed the 250 winners of the 2009 Entrepreneur Of The Year program, and came up with these valuable findings from respondents:


Growth remains number one. Despite the downturn, 78% are still pursuing growth opportunities.

Clearly customers are always right. 78% have increased their focus on customer satisfaction and loyalty. 75% have plans to expand into new customer segments/ geographies.

Cash is king. However, only a fourth were still seeking to secure their cash position.

Maintaining innovation is critical. 60% wish to implement technology for higher business efficiency or accelerated growth.

Some M&A in the offing. 49% are thinking of purchasing distressed competitors, and 55% think the reason for such transactions would be to add strategic value as well as business growth.

Risk is being scrutinized. 37% place higher emphasis on geographic risk exposure

Act now. 45% are increasing the how quickly they are making decisions since the economic downturn.

Employee motivation. 57% are pushing their communication and transparency harder to retain employees. 46% are using the downturn as an opportunity to fill key strategic posts.


Entrepreneurs are some different as E&Y finds from other mature multinational firms in having higher emphasis on growth and acquisitions.

"This survey confirms that, even in the worst times, future market leaders are looking for growth…. Such trailblazers will be vital to the world"s economic recovery." said Greg Ericksen, Global Vice Chair, Strategic Growth Markets, Ernst & Young.


We can recall hearing of many studies which indicate that the fastest-growth companies are born in a recession. Tough economic conditions provide the breeding ground for innovative, cost-focused, nimble and niche-focused companies. Why? Recessions mean lower competition, recessions means more focus on cash flows and recessions mean creativity to secure niches and gain revenues from demanding customers. Its not easy at all, since demand dries up totally and it calls upon guts and will to keep going in the face of current depression and hopes for a better tomorrow.

But E&Y"s selection of visionary entrepreneurs do stand out for a key reason. They seem to look past the cloud of economic downturn and to the silver lining. Growth and customers are the lifeblood of any business, and by staying focused on what brings in the cash into the door, this mindset lays out a good game plan for all business owners to survive and thrive.

When things do turn around, look for these terrific companies run by E&Y Entrepreneurs of the Year to show the path to success.

Ernst and Young, Entrepreneurs of the Year, growth, customers, survey, employees

]]>11.23.20095:23 pm
Deloitte"s recently published 24th Annual Holiday Survey of retail spending and trends vindicates what you are likely seeing all around you. Consumers are expected to increasingly use social media for their holiday shopping this year.

Deloitte finds 17% of consumers plan to use social media in their holiday shopping, and among those, 60% plan to use it to find discounts, coupons and sale information. 53% plan to use social media to research gift ideas and 52% plan to check the gift wish lists of friends and family.

In terms of user demographics, 52% are 18-29 years old, 33% are 30-44 years old and 12% are 45-60 years old. 19% plan to use their cell phone to find store locations, research prices, find product info, get discounts and coupons and read reviews. 25% expect to make a holiday purchase with their phone. 22% will shop primarily online this year, and 44% will use an online coupon.

Here are some more interesting findings:

Consumers May Not Return to Old Habits
Consumers have not only changed their shopping habits for this year, but this could well be a permanent change. 26% will spend less in the future than prior to the recession. 44% say they are loyal to stores they like, but make fewer trips or purchase less at them. According to Deloitte"s Stacey Janiak, "…Consumers will not return to spending levels seen before the recession anytime soon, and high-volume discretionary purchasing could remain a thing of the past."

Men More Optimistic Than Women and Spending More
Women are less optimistic about the economy, and 53% of women would spend less this holiday season, compared to 43% of men. 50% women say the economy will improve next year, compared to 58%.

Sustained Interest in Green
20% say they plan to purchase more eco-friendly products this holiday season than they did in the past. 47% are willing to pay more for a green gift.

The survey polled 10,878 consumers between September 24 and October 2, 2009.

Here"s what we have to say:

First, this is a big win for social media in general and also for US consumers. Last year, social media (whether it be Twitter, Facebook, MySpace or LinkedIn) would not have made the radar either in terms of affecting the overall consumer psyche, much less impact retail buying behavior. US consumers are turning out to be a smart lot and social media has also gained ground. So it does make a whole lot of sense that cost-conscious consumers with increasing usage of networks, connections and friends are able to scout out and take advantage of deals. It"s harder to say whether retailers will win or lose, clearly lowest prices will be discovered quickly and consumers will gravitate to them, but retailers can also use social media and use viral marketing to their advantage to buzz their products at fractions of cost of normal advertising.

Second, we wonder how social media will be used. Will stores Twitter about what"s on sale on a shelf? Will you get instant info on whether size 9 is available at Neiman Marcus in the color you"re looking for? Will your friend Twitter you on a great discount she has found? Will retailers announce midnite sales with throwaway prices and bitly their coupon? Will you get a sales invite or coupon from your friend on Facebook? Will you become a fan of Sports Authority and buy a golf set when it comes on sale? Will groups of friends on Facebook converge at a retailer site to make a bulk purchase to gain discounts? And many such others.

Third, we would not be surprised if both consumers and retailers find innovative ways to clear both the information and goods market. This is the serendipitous juxtaposition of a high volume of consumers, retailers and smart social media platforms. And this will likely lead someone to come up with a unique way to leverage social media, and some sharp entrepreneur will pick it up create a new service. Exciting, isn"t it?

In any case, don't be surprised this year if you see one of every three 38-year old women set down their iphones in a mall, expand a bitly link on their Twitter account, come up with the bar code on Twitpic and scan it on the cash register to get a pure cashmere wool sweater, originally $125, for just $32!! That"s the real deal.

Deloitte, social media, Twitter, usage, coupon, retail, holiday season, survey, consumers
]]>11.16.20094:00 pm
We saw this on the Grant Thornton home page, and the title was so tantalizing, it was too good not to dig in and blog about it.

This recently released study by David Weild and Edward Kim indicates that a sharp fall in US publicly listed companies is generally driving a depression in US stock markets and further, that it has inhibited economic recovery, impaired the job market and undermined U.S.competitiveness. The deep underlying cause for this – severe changes to the market structure over the last twenty years.

The effects are well known, and we read the authors" 44 page report to see if the connection to IPOs is well founded. We"ll quote verbatim from the report to make points and we"ll add our own analysis and observations.

First of all, we must say it is a compelling read with some disturbing trends and conclusions that vividly show that the US has experienced serious decline of leadership in the IPO market, and overseas markets have seen rapid growth in IPO listings, especially in Asia, where listings have more than exceeded their strong GDP performance.

"The Great Depression in Listings," as Grant Thornton calls it, is the precipitous decline over the last decade in the number of publicly listed companies in the United States. Consider in 2008, there were 6,943 publicly listed companies in the US, a full 38% lower than the previous peak of 8,823 US companies, and this comparison looks even worse at minus 55% if you adjust this number for intervening GDP growth. The authors think that the number of companies in the US should actually double to keep up with "replacement" level of what is needed on a relative basis.

What has led to this significant drop? The authors list three key causes:

1. Problems in market structure are undermining the United States" global competitiveness. Essentially, US listed markets are in secular decline since 1991

2. The number of new listings needed merely to maintain the United States" listed markets is much larger than expected. US lags Asia and its capacity to generate new listings is well below replacement needs. The US needs 360 new listings per year merely to maintain a steady number of listed companies in the U.S.

3. The lack of new listings in the United States" markets is threatening the U.S. job market. This impacts small businesses the most, and the authors calculate that up to 22 million jobs may have been lost because of the broken US IPO market.

Grant Thornton has a strong argument that the underlying reason for "The Great Depression in Listings" is not Sarbanes-Oxley, but what they call "The Great Delisting
Machine," an array of regulatory changes that were meant to advance low-cost trading, but have had the unintended consequence of stripping economic support for the value
components (quality sell-side research, capital commitment and sales) that are needed to support markets, especially for smaller capitalization companies. GT cautions that today, capital formation in the U.S. is on life support. Within the venture capital universe, the average time from first venture investment to IPO has more than doubled.

The authors content that low cost trading, the advent of the online brokerage (ETrade, Ameritrade etc.), new order handling rules, decimalization (remember the cute fractions for stock prices), Sarbox and the global research settlement has led to a culture of "Casino Capitalism" in the US markets. Black pools of capital, unregulated hedge funds, naked and predatory shorting, high-frequency trading, and credit defaults swaps (the menace which led to this recent recession) are all rampant and rapidly spreading in US markets. The charts show that high frequency trading accounts for 70% of all US equities trading.

Is all lost? The authors point to two solutions which can help, and Grant Thornton urges Congress and the SEC to hold immediate hearings to understand why the U.S. markets have shed listings at a rate faster than any other developed market, and to pursue solutions that, together with thoughtful oversight, will advance the U.S. economy, grow jobs, better protect consumers and reduce the deficit — all without major expenditures by the U.S. government:

1. Alternative public market segment: A public market solution that provides an economic model to support the "value components" (research, sales and capital commitment) in the marketplace. This solution would establish a new, parallel market segment that benefits from a fixed spread and commission structure. It would be subject to traditional SEC registration and reporting oversight (e.g., annual and quarterly reporting, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance).

2. Enhancements to the private market: A private market solution that enables the creation of a qualified investor marketplace — consisting of both institutional investors and large accredited investors — that allows issuers to defer many of the costs associated with becoming a public company before they are ready for an IPO. This market would serve as an important bridge to an IPO.

The first one is almost a throwback to the eighties with fixed commissions to support value-adding trading activites, while the second calls for a shadow market where unregistered securities can be freely transacted by legal investors.

The report is full of charts which support the (rather distressing) conclusions, and Grant Thornton has provided insights and trends not heretofore studied in this manner. The historical facts are clear and point to a crisis in IPO markets in the US.

The authors draw a dramatic conclusion that 22 million jobs have been potentially lost due to the decline of IPO listings since 1997. This is a huge number, and though the presented math seems to support this, it is arguable whether so many jobs have not been created in the US, and conversely if the IPO market were to revive, that we could create equal numbers on the rebound. Clearly, a large number of US jobs have not been created since more companies did list outside the US - but 22 million, that just stretches our envelope. Does going IPO automatically create jobs? And don"t pre-IPO companies hire employees, regardless of whether they list in the US or not?

Doubtless, there is a crisis in the US IPO markets, and this issue is getting compounded each year. If action were not taken now, the US could lose the lead it has held for decades in global capital markets. The situation is dire indeed, and all regulators and lawmakers should react to save the US from certain followership.

This report is a must-read for all players in the capital market space, and we trust you will find the results equally astounding.

Clearly, this is a wake up call for America, and the title does full justice to the seriousness of this problem.

Grant Thornton, Wake-up Call, IPO, Markets, listings, Great Depression
]]>11.16.20091:44 pm
Twitter just released its latest exciting functionality - Twitter Lists, and we think it"s awesome and very timely.

It allows us to curate who we think are the most appropriate Tweeters to follow in our niche space of The Big Four Firms, accounting, finance, tax, jobs and related topics.

We have already created some list, which we are calling "The Best Of". We rather like this name, but we"ll evolve as lists get more ingrained, and may change.

For example after our search, all the Twitterers we think are most relevant to follow for Deloitte happenings in the Twitter universe, we have added to our "The Best of Deloitte" list.

This is our subjective selection, and we think it's a pretty good one. That"s not to say that we have completely covered all the bases, so if there is someone that just needs to be on or off any of these lists, please DM or shout out to us @big4alum. Thanks in advance.

Also, we"ll continue to refine and add/subtract to this list over time, but our intent is to keep them highly relevant and focused. We see that some of our list already have some followers and no doubt this will pick up as Twitter Lists get more ingrained and Twitter itself allows tweets and Twitter Lists to be retweeted.

So, here are our lists – follow us or follow the lists, and keep that feedback going!!

All The Lists
http://twitter.com/big4alum/lists

Best of Accenture
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-accenture

Best of Capgemini
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-capgemini

Best of Deloitte
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-deloitte

Best of Ernst & Young
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-ernst-young

Best of KPMG
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-kpmg

Best of PricewaterhouseCoopers
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-pwc

Best of Accounting
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-accounting

Best of Finance
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-finance

Best of Tax
http://twitter.com/big4alum/best-of-tax


Again, we"re at http://www.twitter.com/big4alum

Twitter, Lists, Best of, big4alum, tax, accounting, finance, KPMG, Deloitte
]]>11.09.20095:41 pm
Recently, Deloitte released its 2009 Technology Fast 500 Rankings, an annual ranking of the fastest growing technology, media, telecommunications, life sciences and clean technology companies in North America.

The criterion – grow the fastest in revenue over five years. And the number 1 winner - ReachLocal, a privately-held global provider of localized Internet advertising solutions based in Woodland Hills, CA, with revenue of $147 million and a 5-year fiscal growth rate of (get this!) 146,050% percent. In 2004, ReachLocal"s revenues were just $100,000 and in 2008, its revenues had catapulted to $147 million, yes that"s in millions.

And here"s what this company does: "ReachLocal brings order to the fragmented local Internet by connecting advertisers, publishers, and creative solutions providers together on one platform. Wherever customers are online, ReachLocal helps businesses find them with the broadest reach of local digital media, a dedicated force of local Internet Marketing Consultants, and technology that continually optimizes results."

Here are the top ten winners of this ranked list:

(Rank Company Sector Five-year Revenue Growth CEO)

1 ReachLocal Internet 146050% Zorik Gordon
www.reachlocal.com

2 Infinera Corporation Communications/Networking 86580% Jagdeep Singh
www.infinera.com

3 Affymax, Inc. Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 54768% Arlene M. Morris
www.affymax.com

4 Hughes Communications, Inc. Communications/Networking 49988% Pradman P. Kaul
www.hughes.com

5 Entropic Communications, Inc. Semiconductor 40691% Patrick Henry
www.entropic.com

6 Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 38769% N. Anthony Coles
www.onyx-pharm.com

7 Data Domain, Inc. Computers/Peripherals 35084% Frank Slootman
www.datadomain.com

8 Genomic Health, Inc. Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 33716% Kimberly Popovits
www.genomichealth.com

9 Zila, Inc. Biotechnology/Pharmaceutical 27715% David R. Bethune
www.zila.com

10 Force10 Networks, Inc. Communications/Networking 24528% Henry Wasik
www.force10networks.com

Here are some interesting facts about this ranking:

The Western region of the United States has the highest concentration of ranked companies (34%), followed by the Northeast (28%), Southeast (15%), Canada (10%), Southwest (8%) and Midwest (5%).
The software sector was 38% with 189 companies, followed by communications/networking (16%), biotechnology/pharmaceuticals (13%) and Internet (9%). Comprising the balance 24% were medical equipment, scientific/technical instrumentation, computer/peripherals, semiconductors, media/entertainment and clean technology companies.

In the top 10, there were 4 biotech and pharma but no software companies. Deloitte added clean technology as a new category in 2009 and 7 companies made the list.

The average growth rate for the Fast 500 fell by 720% to 2,486% in 2009, from 3,206% in 2008. The 10-year high was recorded in 2002, when the overall average growth rate was 6,772%, the 10-year low was in 2007 with average growth of 1,823%.

To make this list, current-year revenues must exceed $5 million USD or CD, and doubled in last 5 years.

We are quite amazed by the ultra-strong growth exhibited by these Fast 500 Tech companies, clearly with the average company growing by 2,500% means that they have multiplied their sales by 2.5 times in five years. Clearly, such growth is mainly doable in tech companies, where innovative research, visionary management and new solutions can find receptive customers, either by changing the current paradigm or offering services which provide value to a growing list of customers. Also interesting to note the total absence of software companies in the top 10, is the era of Microsofts gone for ever?

Given that statistically, most small businesses fail in their first five years of starting up, these companies deserve much acclaim, and thanks to Deloitte for granting that much needed recognition.

Deloitte, Fast 500 Tech, ReachLocal, Infinera, biotech, communication, internet
]]>11.07.20092:29 pm
Capgemini just reported its Q3-2009 financial results with revenues of EUR 1,946 million, which was 9.0% below Q3-2008 revenues of EUR 2,098 million on constant exchange rates. On a reported basis revenues were 7.3% lower. Capgemini attributed this to a decline in the economic environment, and a sharp reduction in corporate IT spending.

In terms of segments, Consulting Services and Local Professional Services revenues fell 12.5% on average, and those activities most vulnerable to the economic cycle falling the most. Outsourcing Services provided an offsetting effect with a 2.7% decline in revenues due to the expected – and announced – fall in business under a major contract in North America.

In terms of geography, UK and Ireland revenues gained 1.5%, North America revenues fell 7.3%. Revenues in other regions fell 13.3% on average, with France posting a fall of 9.9%.

Q3-2009 bookings were EUR 1,981 million, with Outsourcing Services bookings increasing 7% over Q3-2008, in Consulting Services, Technology Services and Local Professional Services, the book-to-bill ratio remained above 1.

Capgemini provided some forecasts for Q4-2009, estimating it would drop 9% versus Q4-2008, but the company confirmed an operating margin % of around 7% for full-year 2009. Capgemini indicated that signs that activity is stabilizing and even picking up in some market segments, though benefits are not expected to filter through immediately.

Let"s break down this for some interesting conclusions:

First, the revenue decline is generally in line with Accenture"s Q4-2009 and other Big4 firms which have recently reported. Capgemini reports in Euros, so it was spared some of the negative impacts of the appreciating US dollar which hurt many of the other Big Four which report in US dollars.

Second, Outsourcing is clearly resonating with clients, and cost-conscious customers are looking to large IT companies to help them reduce their own infrastructure costs. A relatively smaller fall in Outsourcing revenues is also in line with what Accenture recently reported.

Third, bookings in the Q3-2009 were actually slightly ahead of revenue, indicating that the pipeline is not growing as fast as one would like, but certainly not shrinking.

Fourthly, Q4-2009 guidance of a 9% drop indicates that the second half of 2009 would be weaker than what Capgemini guided in its Q2-2009 earnings release, where it indicated that H2-2009 revenues would drop between 4% and 6%. The company seems to be managing costs in a tough environment and keeping expenses generally in line with the decline in top line. Operating margin in 2009 is expected to be 7% versus 8.5% achieved in full year 2008.

Finally, recent reports and chatter on Twitter indicates that Capgemini will be strongly expanding in India, and pushing its Business Information Management services. With Outsourcing strong and Kanbay hopefully fully incorporated into operations, India clearly seems to be a strong source of revenue and growth for the company in the future.

Investors seemed to be quite neutral to this announcement and the stock stayed about EUR 31 per share on Euronext, though Capgemini has retreated from its highs of around EUR 37 reached in mid October 2009.

With markets stabilizing, and reasonable growth prospects ahead, 2010 may show better results from the company.

Capgemini, earnings, Q3-2009, revenues, operating margin, outsourcing, guidance,



]]>11.05.20097:19 pm
We have blogged earlier about Universum, the employer branding company, particularly on their MBA and undergraduate surveys of top employers. The Big Four firms, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Accenture typically make the top ranks in their surveys.

Now they have come up with the world"s Top 50 most attractive employers, their first global index of employer attractiveness which highlights the world"s most powerful employer brands, those companies that excel in talent attraction and retention.

To come up with these results, nearly 120,000 students at top academic institutions in US, Japan, China, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Russia, Spain, Canada and India chose their ideal companies to work for.

And the Big Four firms are again on the very top of this list. Against some very tough competition and some very tough critics (students!) all the firms made the Top 10 Global top 50 business list, in august company of Google, Goldman Sachs, McKinsey and Microsoft. Accenture was just a tad behind at rank 23.

Global Top 50 Business

Company Ranking 2009

Google 1
PricewaterhouseCoopers 2
Microsoft 3
Goldman Sachs 4
Ernst & Young 5
Procter & Gamble 6
J.P. Morgan 7
KPMG 8
McKinsey & Company 9
Deloitte 10

Accenture 23

Interestingly, Universum also put together a global top 50 engineering company list, and the Big Four firms also make good rankings on that list as well, again aside top companies such as IBM, Intel, BMW and General Electric. In this list, Accenture was the first of the Big Four at rank 20, with KPMG making the last of the lot at rank 47. Big Four firms are not typically known for engineering, so we are certainly surprised at this. Perhaps the definition is broader than just hardcore engineering, in which case, the Big Four firms do offer services in hardware, software, outsourcing, system design, ERP, social media and disciplines related to business information technology.

Global Top 50 Engineering

Company Ranking 2009
Google 1
Microsoft 2
IBM 3
BMW 4
Intel 5

Accenture 20
Deloitte 29
Ernst & Young 33
PricewaterhouseCoopers 37
KPMG 47

In any case, Big Four professionals can feel quite proud of this ranking, and alumni can use this in their cocktail conversations!

Big Four Firms, Top 50 Most Attractive, Universum, KPMG, Deloitte, Accenture
]]>10.27.20097:58 pm